We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Judges’ independence in Parliament

Sir, On the eve of Labour’s longest period in office, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf, delayed his retirement (report, August 1) to oppose the dismantling of the post of Lord Chancellor as guarantor within government of the independence of the judiciary (letters, July 26, etc).

Almost too late our judges, who have relied on judicial review and the Human Rights Act to keep government power within bounds, must now see that their independence derives from a strong Parliament and their part in it. The systematic weakening of Parliament, cut by cut, has been a feature of new Labour policy.

Only the retention of the Lord Chancellor as the connecting force between government, Parliament and the judiciary can keep the balance between the three. The continued active presence of senior judges in the Lords is also needed to protect Parliament’s independence and to assist in the making of sound laws.

Yours faithfully,

WILLIAM WYNDHAM

(Author, Peers in Parliament Reformed, Quiller, 1998),

Castlegate House,

Lewes, East Sussex BN7 1YT.

August 1.