We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Is 60 too old to become a parent?

There is no right to bear a child at any age. Having a child is a privilege.

Sir, As the mother of an IVF child I wrestled hard with the issues you consider in your leading article (“Mother load” , Jan 18). Like many who suspend moral certainty when confronted with the alternative of great personal loss, I justified my eventual decision to give birth in my mid-40s as being “at the last reasonable moment”.

I was certain of one thing, however. There is no right to bear a child at any age. Having a child is a privilege. It is right that a society that believes itself compassionate should provide medical help to those who cannot have children but that does not imply a right to have children, however passionate the parents’ desire may be.

L. Smith

Advertisement

London NW6

Sir, I read your leading article several times but could not find any comment about men over 60 becoming fathers. If I or Rachida Dati return to work within days of birth we are vilified. If a man does, he is not. If a man over 60 has a child his fertility is commented upon and praise heaped upon him. A woman is criticised.

If a ban on older people having IVF children is introduced then this must be applied equally to the sexes or, if there is an imbalance, let mothers be older as women live longer.

Susan Singleton

Advertisement

Pinner, Middx

Sir, Sue Tollefsen’s right to choose is paramount (report, Jan 18)? After all this philosophy was supreme in heralding sweeping changes in favour of the abortion lobby decades ago. The “pro choice” argument cannot be applied selectively.

Advertisement

Dr Jack Gilliat

London E15