We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Fortune, fame and FSA fine

ROBERT BONNIER was catapulted to fame in the technology boom of the late 1990s. His online directories business Scoot.com came within a whisker of entry to the FTSE 100.

Scoot was valued at more than £3 billion and the personal shareholding of Mr Bonnier, who was still in his twenties, was briefly worth £130 million, before Scoot, like most dot-coms, imploded, its demise hastened by an alleged dirty tricks campaign.

Mr Bonnier went on to back or stalk a number of listed businesses, most notably the video games company SCi and the serviced offices group Regus. It was his stakebuilding in Regus in late 2002 that stirred up widespread takeover speculation and attracted the attention of regulators.

The Financial Services Authority, fining him £290,000 in 2004, then a record personal fine, found that he had misled the stock market 12 times in the space of a seven-week period.

He had given outside investors the impression that he was stake-building in Regus, when in fact he was selling down his holding, it ruled. When he claimed to be a beneficial holder of 15 per cent of Regus and to be exploring a possible bid, his holding was in fact “negligible”, the FSA said.

Advertisement

Amid the Regus takeover froth, he closed out his positions, making a £643,225 profit.

Mr Bonnier, who was censured by the Takeover Panel, said that he had no intention to mislead the market. His positions were taken in contracts for difference. Had the rules for CFD disclosure then been in place, his disclosures would have been correct.