We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Finnish delay fuels British reactor doubts

Construction of the reactor at Olkiluoto has been delayed for nearly a decade
Construction of the reactor at Olkiluoto has been delayed for nearly a decade
HEIKKI SAUKKOMAA/REUTERS

Doubts have grown over the future of the next generation of nuclear reactors in Britain after the announcement of a nine-year delay in building the first one in Finland.

Areva, the French group developing the new-generation European Pressurised Reactor facility at Olkiluoto in Finland, said that it would not be operational until 2018.

The announcement sparked fury in Helsinki, which had hoped to be receiving electricity from the reactor in 2009. It may also cause jitters in Downing Street, after the decision to ask Areva to play a central role in Britain’s next nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point in Somerset.

Areva not only designed the units but also is due to deliver the steam supply systems and the instrumentation and control systems. The latter are at the heart of the Finnish delays.

The £16 billion plant at Hinkley Point C will be built by EDF Energy, Areva’s French partner, which had hoped to have it ready for 2021. However, the timetable has already slipped and may fall back further after a European Commission inquiry into state subsidies for the project.

Advertisement

French sources insist there is no reason to assume that the Hinkley Point reactors will run into the quicksand that has hit the Finnish operation. They blame the fiasco at Olkiluoto on the breakdown of communications with Teollisuuden Voima, the Finnish electricity group that ordered the reactor.

Areva says TVO took four years to approve the reactor’s instrumentation and control system, twice as long as expected. “The principal driver of recent delays to the project has been the reactor instrumentation and control system approval,” Areva said.

French sources say there are no technical problems with the EPR unit in Finland and that projects to build similar reactors in China and France “made substantial progress this year”. Although the Finnish project was known to be running late, Areva had refused to give a completion date until yesterday.

With the final costs of the Olkiluoto reactor likely to be double the original figure of €3.2 billion, the French group is in the firing line. “The delays are because the planning of the plant has taken needlessly long,” Jouni Silvennoinen, TVO’s project chief, said.

The row over the delay has already resulted in litigation, with the International Chamber of Commerce studying claim and counterclaim from TVO and Areva. TVO is demanding €1.8 billion in compensation. Areva and Siemens, the German group that has a 27 per cent stake in the consortium building the EPR in Olkiluoto, are demanding €2.7 billion on the ground that the Finnish group is to blame.

Advertisement

The project is also straining relations between Areva and Siemens, which blamed the delay on the French group. Siemens said it was on course to complete its part of the deal — for the non-nuclear part of the plant — on time.

Areva has already booked losses of €3.9 billion in connection with the Finnish project. It said that the latest delay would not add to that sum.

The original and now-defunct Hinkley Point A atomic power station and 11 other Magnox generators and nuclear sites have been handed over to Babcock, the engineering group, in a £4.2 billion clean-up contract.

Babcock won the contract from the Nuclear Decommissioning Agency through its Cavendish Nuclear division, a combine of several acquired nuclear engineering businesses. The 13½-year contract is to be delivered in a joint venture with Fluor, the American energy engineering group.