We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Expense reform peer Baroness Hayman claims £200,000

The Lord Speaker, who is reviewing peers’ allowances, has claimed for a second home

The peer in charge of reforming House of Lords expenses has received £200,000 in allowances over the past eight years by designating her home in Norfolk as her main address.

Baroness Hayman, the Lord Speaker, has claimed allowances for living outside London while owning a family home in the capital.

She receives £38,000 a year to help with the cost of accommodation in London, on top of her £108,000-a-year salary. Before she became Speaker, she claimed £18,000 a year in tax-free overnight allowances. Earlier this summer, the House Committee, which is chaired by Hayman, requested that the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB) conduct a review of financial support for peers.

The move followed a series of disclosures in The Sunday Times highlighting abuses of the expenses system.

The SSRB has already identified as an area of concern peers' nomination of homes outside London as their main address.

Advertisement

Its initial consultation paper said: "The current overnight allowance system might be regarded as creating an incentive for members to designate a non-London property as their main home so they can claim overnight subsistence ... when attending the House."

Hayman has not broken any rules and said she had complied with the spirit and the letter of the allowances system. She said she had chosen to make Norfolk her main home in 2001 after her husband's retirement.

Her expenses claims raise questions, however, about why taxpayers should pay London accommodation allowance to someone who has owned a home in the city for more than 30 years.

On Friday Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said Hayman should "step aside" from the process of reforming expenses as she benefits from the current system.

Hayman is a former Labour MP who was made a peer in 1996 and held ministerial roles in the first term of Tony Blair's government.

Advertisement

She and her husband Martin bought their family home near Hampstead Heath, London, in 1975. It is now estimated to be worth £1m. Their four children were brought up and went to school in the area. When she became a peer, she took the title Baroness Hayman of Dartmouth Park in the London Borough of Camden.

They continued to live in the London home after buying a former vicarage in a village near Thetford, Norfolk, for £405,000 in 1997. The property, which has a pool and tennis court, was initially the family's second home. They had previously had a shared cottage in Norfolk.

After leaving her ministerial job in 2001, Hayman designated the Norfolk property as her main home. She was then able to claim £18,000 a year tax-free for the cost of a maintaining the London home while attending parliament.

She continued to work for various London-based organisations, including Cancer Research UK, the Human Tissue Authority and the Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew. Her husband also chaired a charity based in the capital and became a director of a City company. She said these activities did not require residence in London.

On her appointment as Lord Speaker three years ago, the baroness became eligible to claim night subsistence allowance for public office holders whose main home is outside London. The sum, which has since risen from £34,000 to £38,000, is taxed.

Advertisement

Yesterday, Hayman wrote in an e-mail that she had been "a long-standing advocate of a root-and-branch external review of the financial support systems available for members of the House of Lords".

She continued: "After my husband's retirement, I left ministerial office and we made our Norfolk home our principal residence and it remains so today ... We also made the decision to retain the house that we already owned in London in order to enable me to participate fully in the work of the House of Lords."

Hayman said this was "the precise purpose of the overnight allowance scheme".

She said the claims were justified even though she had no mortgage. "At the risk of stating the obvious, a mortgage is not the only expense involved in maintaining a house in London," she wrote.

She added: "As the House sits for the majority of the working days in the year, we have both continued to use the London residence as an address for correspondence."

Advertisement

The SSRB expects to deliver its recommendations to Hayman and the prime minister by the end of October.