We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Design and dissenters

Sir, Jack Pringle’s definition of the decline of City planning with the fall of the grand patron and the rise of the developer (letter, Aug 18) could not be further from reality.

Throughout the country grand patrons are commissioning projects which can be seen in many of our leading cities and, in particular, in London. They have all the skills of visionary architects and developers and give the community new places to use and enjoy.

Criticisms of the planning system need to be addressed to Mr Pringle’s organisation, RIBA. For some two decades this champion of architecture has failed us all in not being seen at the forefront of modern architecture in day-to-day activity. While it promotes competitions, RIBA remains an introverted member-protection organisation rather than one looking after the wider interests of the public.

When we hear of architects resigning from projects or RIBA criticising its members, we’ll know that it has moved from being a trade union to a wider interest group with a commitment to people.

Advertisement

SIR STUART LIPTON

Chelsfield Partners LLP

London W1

Sir, Magnus Linklater (Comment, Aug 16) and I share a passion for Edinburgh. However, when he writes of “a financial centre [with] glass bound office blocks” he must mean the Exchange area, where there is not one glass building. There are also no “buildings whose height obliterates the views”. We have a firm “skyline policy”, which we are strengthening further.

He uses the tragic fire site in Cowgate, where to his dismay an old complex of nightclubs, offices, shops and bars may be replaced by “hotels, offices, shops and restaurants” as an example of how “the developers . . . produce the masterplans and the city . . . responds to them” despite that the council produced a planning brief for the site well before any developer became involved.

Advertisement

Edinburgh was never achieved with central planning: even the famed Georgian New Town was the result of many hands, abandoned plans and dodgy builders. The “central vision” that he now craves has produced some less than perfect results, as a short trip to Cumbernauld might persuade him.

I prefer to rely on a multitude of talent, rather than a single central vision, and to push that talent to do better — the city was at the very forefront when we published our Edinburgh Standards for Urban Design and appointed Sir Terry Farrell as city design champion.

COUNCILLOR TREVOR DAVIES

Convenor, planning committee

City of Edinburgh Council