We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Court is no place for QC . . . as a juror

A QC on jury service at the Old Bailey was discharged from serving for a third successive time yesterday after explaining that he knew lawyers involved in the case.

The barrister was in the jury panel for a burglary trial but said he could not serve because he knew several people in the courtroom.

Barristers were exempt from jury service, along with other professionals such as doctors or members of the Armed Forces, until April this year.

Advertisement

Under the Criminal Justice Act aimed at preventing the middle class from opting out of jury service, they now have to sit although they can seek a deferral.

In six days of jury service the QC has been ineligible to serve on three separate trials. Last week, he was discharged from a murder trial because he knew the prosecutor. Yesterday he was discharged from a sex trial because he knew the judge. Then he was asked to serve on a burglary trial — but was ruled ineligible again.

One of the judges said: “I don’t know how this legislation is going to work intelligently.” The trial went ahead without a replacement juror.