We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Cost of migrants

It is, of course, much cheaper for employers to hire foreign nationals who have been trained at other countries’ and employers’ expense

Sir, Seamus Nevin, of the Institute of Directors, claims that employers’ enthusiasm for foreign workers is the fault of successive governments, who have supposedly failed to educate English young people (report, Aug 28). What he fails to note is that, since the late 1990s, UK businesses’ spending on training has fallen dramatically and consistently. It is, of course, much cheaper for them to hire foreign nationals who have been trained at other countries’ and employers’ expense.

Baroness Wolf of Dulwich

Sir Roy Griffiths Professor of Public Sector Management, KCL

Sir, Lord Green of Deddington’s analysis (letter, Aug 31) of the migration trade-off seems to be based entirely on Britain’s self-interest. He appears to be oblivious of the desperate plight of the Syrian refugees. A few weeks ago we commemorated the heroism and the sacrifices of the wartime generation. I doubt if our response to the Syrian catastrophe will so impress future generations. During the war, the statement “Britain stood alone” could be said with pride. Today it is becoming a badge of shame.

R P Fernando

Advertisement

Epsom, Surrey