We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Childcare and tax

If the Government wishes to see more women at the top, then women need more support when it matters most to their careers

Sir, The current debate about scrapping child benefit for higher-rate taxpayers is missing an obvious point. Working parents often have to spend a large proportion of their net income on childcare. As a middle-ranking civil servant and working mother expecting my second child, I will soon be spending nearly all of my net income on childcare, although I am a higher-rate taxpayer (just). The financial incentive for me to return to work is therefore limited — precisely at the time when my male peers are starting to reach their potential for senior management.

If the Government, and society, wish to see more women at the top, then women — including higher-rate taxpayers — need more support when it matters most to their careers. If childcare costs themselves cannot be subject to tax breaks, the Chancellor might at least consider how child benefit eligibility could be based on net income after childcare costs, especially for children under 5.

Alice Jacobs
London W6