We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Cadbury, takeovers and the Government

The Government should be actively involved in any foreign takeover of a leading British company but it has a poor track record in such matters

Sir, As the Government (ie, the taxpayer) will bear the costs of unemployment when job cuts result from the takeover of Cadbury (report, Times Online, Jan 19), then it should be actively involved in any foreign takeover of a leading British company. It must ensure that short-term benefits for shareholders do not override the long-term interests of the British people.

The theoretical advantages claimed for “globalisation” remain, by and large, theory. Lord Mandelson should act now either to stop this takeover or to have cast-iron long-term guarantees that jobs will not be lost and also ensure that contributions to pension funds are protected for many years.

John Allison

Maidenhead, Berks

Sir, Distressing as the takeover of Cadbury is, it shrinks into the shadows when compared with successive governments’ response to the takeover of our energy providers. Not far behind the defence of the realm lies the duty of government to protect our energy supplies. How many more takeovers of strategically important companies have to take place before government takes action. The 19th-century laissez faire attitude died with the rescue of the banking system and measured action needs to be taken now.

Advertisement

Chris Samuel

Cardiff