We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Blissful ignorance

Medical training, however limited, would have been of little use to Keats in diagnosing his tuberculosis

Sir, Jack Malvern (report, Mar 30) affords John Keats knowledge that his limited medical training could have provided. As Andrew Motion states in his biography of the poet, Keats could not have known that his illness was contagious because the tubercle bacillus was not definitively characterised until 1882 — 60 years after Keats died. The reasons for the poet removing himself from his beloved Fanny Brawne were a concoction of far greater complexity.

Peter Larner
Upminster, Essex