We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Atticus

If you’re a traditional Conservative who fears that dropping the famous torch logo is going a bit far, then you should brace yourself for a shock. The Tories’ new advertising agency once suggested the party should ditch its stuffy old blue image in favour of something more modern and vibrant — red.

Karmarama, signed up last week to replace M&C Saatchi, dreamt up the plan in 2003 while working on a mock campaign in the last days of Iain Duncan Smith’s leadership. The agency’s creative team thought the switch would signal that the party was open to change, and also favoured scrapping the torch in favour of a matey thumbs-up logo.

The new logo would have appeared in a poster campaign associating the party with good things and Labour with bad things. In one poster, a smiling man gave a thumbs-up to the slogan: “It rained less under a conservative government”. The small “c” was supposed to look more friendly. By contrast, a miserable woman gave a thumbs-down as she explained: “My cat died under Labour”.

Another poster announced: “We won the World Cup under the conservatives”. Just one small problem there. When England won in 1966, Labour was in power.

Advertisement

Rebel MI5 agent says 9/11 planes were holograms

David Shayler, the former MI5 officer turned whistleblower, has joined the 9/11 deniers. “We know for certain that the official story of 9/11 isn’t true,” he tells the New Statesman. “The twin towers did not collapse because of planes and fire. They were brought down in a controlled demolition. The Pentagon was most likely hit by an American missile, not an aeroplane.”

Not that he thinks planes hit the towers. “I believe no planes were involved in 9/11. The only explanation is that they were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes.”

Hard to believe, isn’t it? Come to think of it, are we sure this isn’t an MI5 agent posing as Shayler in an attempt to discredit him? Is there indeed such a person as Shayler, or was he — as some now think — invented by the CIA?

Advertisement