Sir, The details of Andrew Dilnot’s proposals for care of the elderly are unlikely to win universal approval (report, July 5). A failure to take family wealth into account could spur accusations that the taxpayer is subsidising the inheritance of already-wealthy offspring who could have paid for their parents’ care. It is also unclear how pensioners will meet the ongoing cost of accommodation, food and heating, which in my experience are likely to be far higher than £10,000 per year. Not to mention the £2 billion commitment required from the Government.
Despite these reservations, the proposals have the potential to finally create a more equitable and transparent social care funding system. It has been many years since we’ve been this close to a realistic solution, so politicians on both sides of the House have a responsibility to finally grasp the nettle and reform the system. It will be a tragedy if this chance is wasted.
Leon Smith
Chief Executive, Nightingale Care Home
London SW12
Sir, It is disappointing that the long-awaited plans to reform elderly care may be watered down. The review is an honest one and I applaud the findings.
Advertisement
Funding for social care has been overlooked for too long. Surely the Government can see that the review is a low-risk, now or never package?
Yes, all of the recommendations will need some consideration, but if the current, catastrophic system is retained the taxpayer will have to pay an extra £1.4 billion in 2016.
It needs all of the political parties to work together, and to anyone with an elderly or vulnerable relative to push for this opportunity. It’s one not to be wasted.
Dr Chris Handy
Chief Executive, Accord Group