We haven't been able to take payment
You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Act now to keep your subscription
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.
Your subscription is due to terminate
We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account, otherwise your subscription will terminate.

Academies’ deals mean exclusions

CHOICE in education is an inflammatory issue, and Children Now (Feb 8) reports that several city academy schools, which are part-funded by private sponsors, have “cut deals” with ministers that allow them to be more prescriptive.

Funding agreements for 27 city academies show that two academies will be able to exclude children more easily, as they do not have to justify exclusions to an independent appeals panel, as is the norm. A third academy will teach from a curriculum that has “heavy religious input”, and at another, parents do not have the right to withdraw children from religious assembly.

All this adds up to fewer rights for families, says David Wolfe, a barrister at Matrix Chambers in London. “The funding agreements are materially different because the Secretary of State has cut deals with individual sponsors,” he says. These agreements, he says, could have been drawn up differently. “The consequence of not doing so is diminished rights for children and parents.”