“Homemakers aged 30 to 49 were inclined to enter into employment, but most of them are only looking for part-time jobs,” the board wrote.

“People who have recently retired were less inclined to work, while young people who are neither in employment nor in education were the least motivated.”

The study found that 36.1 per cent of 47 people aged between 15 and 29 who were not employed or studying had no plans to find jobs or pursue further training in the coming year, with the prospect of good salary and benefits, work-from-home arrangements and flexible working hours only incentivising some to consider taking up work.

Among recent retirees, 60.9 per cent expressed no interest in working. But some of the elderly residents said good salaries and perks, stress-free duties and support from jobseeker organisations could encourage them to work.

The survey included 200 respondents aged 15 to 29, of whom 85 per cent were employed at the time, with close to 65 per cent of planning to pursue training. For the young respondents who were not employment, about 35 per cent intended to seek jobs.

In the Legco paper, the board also wrote that there was a mismatch between the demand for workers with technical skills and training courses, appraisal systems and work situations.

The board highlighted the importance of technology-based skills, saying: “It is also necessary to include skills on software development or programming, artificial intelligence, big data analysis and other higher-end skills in accordance with market demand.”

Alexa Chow Yee-ping, managing director of AMAC Human Resources Consultants, said the survey might not reflect the overall picture of work ambition among young people, since it focused on those not working or studying.

“If this group of people is in a constant state of idleness, it’s not surprising that one-third of them have no intention to work,” she said. “If the survey targeted those about to finish university and yielded the same result, that will be a huge issue.”

She advised employers to consider whether they could accommodate young people’s preferences for more flexible hours and work-from-home arrangements, while offering more leave, training and providing a hi-tech work environment.

“From the perspective of the government, it’s also lost subsidies, because many students will have been supported by the government in their education who are now not working, meaning they are not taxpayers,” Chow said.

Rennie Wong Man-shun from the Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups’ Youth Employment Network said more details about the survey were needed to fully understand the results, such as the age range of “young people” in the study and the questions asked by interviewers.

“Many young people have chosen to not have a full-time job, but multiple part-time jobs, as a ‘slasher’, which can involve longer working hours than a full-time job,” he said.

Wong said that many young people wanted a choice when it came to their work duties, rather than being assigned them by managers, while also seeking more flexible working arrangements.

But he noted that a person’s ability to work negatively correlated with the amount of time they spent away from employment, especially if they stayed at home without contact with other people.

“They could gradually lose their ability to communicate or other skills that you will only pick up if you are in the workforce. We’re worried about this,” he said.

Hong Kong’s unemployment rate stood at 3 per cent between March and May, unchanged from the figure recorded for February to April.