Skip to Main Content
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.

FTC Ban on Noncompetes Delayed by Texas Judge

The FTC argues noncompetes are unfair to workers. The US Chamber of Commerce says the ban is an 'unlawful power grab.'

July 4, 2024
A contract sitting on a table. (Credit: Shutterstock / Korawat photo shoot)

A Texas court has postponed the Federal Trade Commission's ban on noncompete agreements, siding with plaintiffs who claim the move is an "unlawful power grab."

Noncompete clauses are used in various industries, particularly the tech world, to prevent workers from jumping ship to a rival or starting their own businesses and potentially taking trade secrets with them. However, the agreements mean workers who leave a company are often forced to work outside their field until their noncompete expires, usually for less money. 

The US Chamber of Commerce and a Texas-based tax firm sued, and a court granted an injunction this week; it will decide on the case on or before Aug. 30, Bloomberg reports.

"Noncompete agreements can serve vital procompetitive business and individual interests—like protecting investments in research and development, promoting workforce training, and reducing free-riding—that cannot be adequately protected through other mechanisms such as trade-secret suits or nondisclosure agreements," according to the Chamber of Commerce, which says "the FTC’s ban on noncompete agreements is another attempt at aggressive regulatory proliferation."

When the ban was announced, FTC Chair Lina M. Khan argued that "noncompete clauses keep wages low, suppress new ideas, and rob the American economy of dynamism, including from the more than 8,500 new startups that would be created a year once noncompetes are banned."

The FTC voted 3-2 to issue the rule; Democratic appointees Alvaro Bedoya, Khan, and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter voted yes, while Republican appointees Andrew N. Ferguson and Melissa Holyoak voted no.

The ban did not impact workers with "policy-making authority" who make more than $151,164. It also didn't require contracts to be rewritten; it merely said that the noncompete portion of them was now unenforceable.

Get Our Best Stories!

Sign up for What's New Now to get our top stories delivered to your inbox every morning.

This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.


Thanks for signing up!

Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an eye on your inbox!

Sign up for other newsletters

Prime Big Day Deals

TRENDING

About Emily Price

Weekend Reporter

Emily is a freelance writer based in Durham, NC. Her work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Lifehacker, Popular Mechanics, Macworld, Engadget, Computerworld, and more. You can also snag a copy of her book Productivity Hacks: 500+ Easy Ways to Accomplish More at Work--That Actually Work! online through Simon & Schuster or wherever books are sold.

Read Emily's full bio

Read the latest from Emily Price