Is Adam worth more than Eve? The financial impact of gender bias in the federal reimbursement of gynecological procedures
- PMID: 9062137
- DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.4607
Is Adam worth more than Eve? The financial impact of gender bias in the federal reimbursement of gynecological procedures
Abstract
Purpose: On January 1, 1992, Congress implemented a Medicare payment system based on relative value units (RVU). The RVU multiplied by a dollar conversion factor sets the reimbursement for all procedures covered by Medicare and many other private insurers. This study was undertaken to evaluate discrepancies in federal reimbursement for gender-specific procedures.
Methods: Using the December 1995 Federal Register and the regional Medicare conversion factor ($40.08/RVU), we compared the work RVU and total reimbursement of 24 groups of gender-specific surgical procedures. The groups were matched as carefully as possible so that the amount of work and level of difficulty would be similar, if not identical. Some examples of comparisons are as follows: biopsy of male vs female genitals, hysterectomy vs prostatectomy, staging for ovarian vs testicular cancer, and exenteration for cervical vs prostate cancer.
Results: In the 24 matched procedures, the male-specific procedures were reimbursed at a higher amount in 19 (79%) cases. The female-specific procedures were reimbursed at a higher amount in 3 (12%) cases (P = 0.004). There was no difference in reimbursement for two of the comparisons. Overall, we found that male-specific procedures are reimbursed at an amount which is 44% higher than female-specific procedures. Comparison of work RVU revealed that male-specific procedures were assigned higher values in 19 cases and, overall, male gender-related surgeries had work RVU that were 50% higher than female gender-related surgeries.
Conclusion: There is significant gender bias against the Medicare reimbursement of female-specific services. This results in a lower net reimbursement for gynecologic procedures. In addition, since many private sector insurance carriers now use the resource-based relative value scale system, this gender bias is further potentiated.
Comment in
-
Neither Adam nor Eve seems worth very much anymore.Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Mar;64(3):369-71. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4643. Gynecol Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9062136 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Discrepancies Created by Surgeon Self-Reported Operative Time and the Effects on Procedural Relative Value Units and Reimbursement.Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):182-188. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004467. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34237766 Review.
-
Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):336-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 23. Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28024653
-
A real world analysis of payment per unit time in a Maryland Vascular Practice.J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):1094-8; discussion 1098-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.072. J Vasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20619578
-
Reimbursement for surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology.Curr Opin Oncol. 2001 Sep;13(5):390-3. doi: 10.1097/00001622-200109000-00013. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11555718 Review.
-
Comparison of 1997 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: is Adam still worth more than Eve?Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Aug;66(2):313-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4775. Gynecol Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9264582
Cited by
-
Colonisation and its aftermath: reimagining global surgery.BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 4;9(1):e014173. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014173. BMJ Glob Health. 2024. PMID: 38176746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gender Inequity in the Clinical Setting.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 8;36(5):309-314. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1763518. eCollection 2023 Sep. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023. PMID: 37564345 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surgical sexism in Canada: structural bias in reimbursement of surgical care for women.Can J Surg. 2023 Jul 4;66(4):E341-E347. doi: 10.1503/cjs.022121. Print 2023 Jul-Aug. Can J Surg. 2023. PMID: 37402558 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing Women's Health and Women's Leadership With Endowed Chairs in Women's Health.Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):167-174. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001423. Acad Med. 2017. PMID: 27759706 Free PMC article.
-
Women's health and women's leadership in academic medicine: hitting the same glass ceiling?J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Nov;17(9):1453-62. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0688. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008. PMID: 18954235 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical