Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):219.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02607-5.

Comparison of analgesic effectiveness between nefopam and propacetamol in living kidney donors following rectus sheath block after hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of analgesic effectiveness between nefopam and propacetamol in living kidney donors following rectus sheath block after hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Won-Jung Hwang et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Nefopam and propacetamol are the most commonly used analgesics in postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens. Distinct mechanisms are involved in each drug's anti-nociceptive effects. No studies have compared pain relief efficacy between the two drugs in patients undergoing transplantation surgery. Here, we investigated whether the administration of nefopam or propacetamol to healthy living kidney donors who underwent rectus sheath block (RSB) for parietal pain could reduce the subsequent opioid dose necessary to produce adequate analgesia.

Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 72 donors undergoing elective hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy into two groups: propacetamol (n = 36) and nefopam (n = 36). Intraoperative RSB was performed in all enrolled donors. The primary outcome was the total volume of intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Additionally, the Numeric Rating Scale scores for flank (visceral) and umbilicus (parietal) pain at rest and during coughing were compared, and the Korean adaptation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire (QoR-15 K) was evaluated on POD 1.

Results: Both groups had similar preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. On POD 1, the total amount of PCA infusion was significantly lower in the nefopam group than in the propacetamol group (44.5 ± 19.3 mL vs. 70.2 ± 29.0 mL; p < 0.001). This group also reported lower pain scores at the flank and umbilical sites and required fewer rescue doses of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit. However, pain scores and fentanyl consumption in the ward were comparable between groups. The QoR-15 K scores were similar between groups; there were substantial improvements in breathing, pain severity, and anxiety/depression levels in the nefopam group. The incidences of postoperative complications, including sweating and tachycardia, were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Compared with propacetamol, nefopam provides a greater analgesic effect for visceral pain and enhances the effects of blocks that reduce the opioid requirement in living kidney donors with parietal pain managed by RSB.

Trial registration: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment in the clinical trial database using the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0007351 , Date of registration 03/06/2022).

Keywords: Living donor nephrectomy; Nefopam; Propacetamol; Rectus sheath block.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated standards of reporting trials flow diagram of participant enrollment and study process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Performance of the rectus sheath block. (A) Anatomy of the rectus muscle, and (B) Application of the block. The arrows indicate the path of the needle
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of patient-controlled anesthesia usage on postoperative day 1 between the two groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of rescue dose of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit between the two groups
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of global and subdimension scores from the quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire on postoperative day 1 between the two groups

References

    1. Skrekas G, Papalois VE, Mitsis M, Hakim NS. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a step forward in kidney transplantation? Jsls. 2003;7(3):197–206. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanellis J. The CARI guidelines. Justification for living donor kidney transplantation. Nephrol (Carlton) 2010;15(Suppl 1):S72–79. - PubMed
    1. Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A, Munda R, Alexander JW, Newell KA, Bruce DS, Woodle ES. Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transpl. 2002;2(10):983–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21017.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ergün M, Berkers AW, van der Jagt MF, Langenhuijsen JF, van Özdemir-Brunschot D, van der Vliet JA, Ancona FC, Warlé MC. Components of pain assessment after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58(2):219–22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee Y, Park H, Jee H-J, Lee H-J, Gwon JG, Min H, Jung CW, Kim M-G, Cho C-H. Psychological characteristics and associations between living kidney transplantation recipients and biologically related or unrelated donors. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02017-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms