Does assistive technology contribute to safety among home-dwelling older adults?
- PMID: 38898457
- PMCID: PMC11188293
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11185-8
Does assistive technology contribute to safety among home-dwelling older adults?
Abstract
Background: Assistive technology carries the promise of alleviating public expenditure on long-term care, while at the same time enabling older adults to live more safely at home for as long as possible. Home-dwelling older people receiving reablement and dementia care at their homes are two important target groups for assistive technology. However, the need for help, the type of help and the progression of their needs differ. These two groups are seldom compared even though they are two large groups of service users in Norway and their care needs constitute considerable costs to Norwegian municipalities. The study explores how assistive technology impacts the feeling of safety among these two groups and their family caregivers.
Methods: Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews lasting between 17 and 61 min were conducted between November 2018 and August 2019 with home-dwelling older adults receiving reablement (N = 15) and dementia care (N = 10) and the family caregivers (N = 9) of these users in seven municipalities in Norway. All interviews were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, thematically coded and inductively analyzed following Clarke and Braun's principles for thematic analysis.
Results: Service users in both groups felt safe when knowing how to use assistive technology. However, the knowledge of how to use assistive technology was not enough to create a feeling of safety. In fact, for some users, this knowledge was a source of anxiety or frustration, especially when the user had experienced the limitations of the technology. For the service users with dementia, assistive technology was experienced as disturbing when they were unable to understand how to handle it, but at the same time, it also enabled some of them to continue living at home. For reablement users, overreliance on technology could undermine the progress of their functional improvement and thus their independence.
Conclusion: For users in both service groups, assistive technology may promote a sense of safety but has also disadvantages. However, technology alone does not seem to create a sense of safety. Rather, it is the appropriate use of assistive technology within the context of interactions between service users, their family caregivers and the healthcare staff that contributes to the feeling of safety.
Keywords: Assistive technology; Dementia care; Home-dwelling older adults; Long-term care; Norway; Reablement; Safety.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative study on promoting reablement among older people living at home in Norway: opportunities and constraints.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 4;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07543-z. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35120512 Free PMC article.
-
Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(19):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta25190. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 33755548 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) and realist evaluation of the interdisciplinary home-bAsed Reablement program (I-HARP) for improving functional independence of community dwelling older people with dementia: an effectiveness-implementation hybrid design.BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jul 29;19(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1216-x. BMC Geriatr. 2019. PMID: 31357949 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Time-limited home-care reablement services for maintaining and improving the functional independence of older adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;10(10):CD010825. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010825.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27726122 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):353-60. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1087061. Epub 2015 Sep 15. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016. PMID: 26371519 Review.
References
-
- Thomas MJ, Syse A, Gleditsch RF. Nasjonale befolkningsframskrivinger 2020. Modeller, forutsetninger og resultater: Statistisk sentralbyrå/Statistics Norway; 2020. https://ssb.brage.unit.no/ssb-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2659117/RAPP2....
-
- Christensen K, Wærness K. Long-term care services in Norway: a historical sociological perspective. United Kingdom: Routledge. 2018;1:15–28.
-
- Bikova M, Christensen K. Samproduksjon i mulighetsrommet for brukermedvirkning i norske helse- og omsorgstjenester. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning. 2022;8(1):1–13. 10.18261/tfo.8.1.9.
-
- Ervik R, Lindén TS. The making of ageing policy: theory and practice in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2013.
-
- Andrews TM, Tjerbo T, Ambugo EA, Bliksvær T, Fabritius MK, Aguinaldo SJ et al. Årsaker til kostnadsvekst i kommunale pleie-og omsorgstjenester: KS, UiO og Nordlandsforskning; 2021. https://www.ks.no/contentassets/74113e3111a54fdcad825b67f5849cba/Arsaker....
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical