Measuring effects of ivermectin-treated cattle on potential malaria vectors in Vietnam: A cluster-randomized trial
- PMID: 38683855
- PMCID: PMC11098492
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012014
Measuring effects of ivermectin-treated cattle on potential malaria vectors in Vietnam: A cluster-randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Malaria elimination using current tools has stalled in many areas. Ivermectin (IVM) is a broad-antiparasitic drug and mosquitocide and has been proposed as a tool for accelerating progress towards malaria elimination. Under laboratory conditions, IVM has been shown to reduce the survival of adult Anopheles populations that have fed on IVM-treated mammals. Treating cattle with IVM has been proposed as an important contribution to malaria vector management, however, the impacts of IVM in this One Health use case have been untested in field trials in Southeast Asia.
Methods: Through a randomized village-based trial, this study quantified the effect of IVM-treated cattle on anopheline populations in treated vs. untreated villages in Central Vietnam. Local zebu cattle in six rural villages were included in this study. In three villages, cattle were treated with IVM at established veterinary dosages, and in three additional villages cattle were left as untreated controls. For the main study outcome, the mosquito populations in all villages were sampled using cattle-baited traps for six nights before, and six nights after a 2-day IVM-administration (intervention) period. Anopheline species were characterized using taxonomic keys. The impact of the intervention was analyzed using a difference-in-differences (DID) approach with generalized estimating equations (with negative binomial distribution and robust errors). This intervention was powered to detect a 50% reduction in total nightly Anopheles spp. vector catches from cattle-baited traps. Given the unusual diversity in anopheline populations, exploratory analyses examined taxon-level differences in the ecological population diversity.
Results: Across the treated villages, 1,112 of 1,523 censused cows (73% overall; range 67% to 83%) were treated with IVM. In both control and treated villages, there was a 30% to 40% decrease in total anophelines captured in the post-intervention period as compared to the pre-intervention period. In the control villages, there were 1,873 captured pre-intervention and 1,079 captured during the post-intervention period. In the treated villages, there were 1,594 captured pre-intervention, and 1,101 captured during the post-intervention period. The difference in differences model analysis comparing total captures between arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.61). Secondary outcomes of vector population diversity found that in three villages (one control and two treatment) Brillouin's index increased, and in three villages (two control and one treatment) Brillouin's index decreased. When examining biodiversity by trapping-night, there were no clear trends in treated or untreated vector populations. Additionally, there were no clear trends when examining the components of biodiversity: richness and evenness.
Conclusions: The ability of this study to quantify the impacts of IVM treatment was limited due to unexpectedly large spatiotemporal variability in trapping rates; an area-wide decrease in trapping counts across all six villages post-intervention; and potential spillover effects. However, this study provides important data to directly inform future studies in the GMS and beyond for IVM-based vector control.
Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Conflict of interest statement
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JCH is a military service member of the United States government. This work was prepared as part of his official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that `copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.’ Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. The views expressed in this article reflect the results of research conducted by the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Defense Health Agency, Department of Defense, nor the United States Government.
Figures
![Fig 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11098492/bin/pntd.0012014.g001.gif)
![Fig 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11098492/bin/pntd.0012014.g002.gif)
![Fig 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11098492/bin/pntd.0012014.g003.gif)
![Fig 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11098492/bin/pntd.0012014.g004.gif)
![Fig 5](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11098492/bin/pntd.0012014.g005.gif)
Similar articles
-
Ivermectin Treatment for Cattle Reduced the Survival of Two Malaria Vectors, Anopheles dirus and Anopheles epiroticus, Under Laboratory Conditions in Central Vietnam.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Apr 26;104(6):2165-2168. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1239. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021. PMID: 33901003 Free PMC article.
-
Entomological impact of mass administration of ivermectin and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine in The Gambia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Parasit Vectors. 2022 Nov 17;15(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05557-4. Parasit Vectors. 2022. PMID: 36397132 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mass drug administration of ivermectin in south-eastern Senegal reduces the survivorship of wild-caught, blood fed malaria vectors.Malar J. 2010 Dec 20;9:365. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-365. Malar J. 2010. PMID: 21171970 Free PMC article.
-
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 10;(12):CD008090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008090.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 11;12:CD008090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008090.pub3. PMID: 24323308 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):CD008090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008090.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29226959 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Malaria Report 2020 [Internet]. World Health Organization Global Malaria Programme; 2020 Nov [cited 2023 Nov 3]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015791
-
- The Malaria Elimination Initiative. Vietnam malaria transition and sustainability assessment [Internet]. UCSF; 2021. Oct. Available from: https://shrinkingthemalariamap.org/sites/default/files/resources/vietnam...
-
- Hung LQ, Vries PJ de, Giao PT, Nam NV, Binh TQ, Chong MT, et al.. Control of malaria: a successful experience from Viet Nam. Bull World Health Organ [Internet]. 2002. [cited 2020 Sep 26];80(8):660–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2567582/ - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hemingway J, Shretta R, Wells TNC, Bell D, Djimdé AA, Achee N, et al.. Tools and strategies for malaria control and elimination: what do we need to achieve a grand convergence in malaria? PLoS Biol [Internet]. 2016. Mar;14(3):e1002380. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002380 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous