Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Feb;34(1):31-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.10.005. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

Comparison of dose and risk estimates between ISS Partner Agencies for a 30-day lunar mission

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of dose and risk estimates between ISS Partner Agencies for a 30-day lunar mission

Mark R Shavers et al. Z Med Phys. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

The International Partner Agencies of the International Space Station (ISS) present a comparison of the ionizing radiation absorbed dose and risk quantities used to characterize example missions in lunar space. This effort builds on previous collaborative work that characterizes radiation environments in space to support radiation protection for human spaceflight on ISS in low-Earth orbit (LEO) and exploration missions beyond (BLEO). A "shielded" ubiquitous galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) environment combined with--and separate from--the transient challenge of a solar particle event (SPE) was modelled for a simulated 30-day mission period. Simple geometries of relatively thin and uniform shields were chosen to represent the space vehicle and other available shielding, and male or female phantoms were used to represent the body's self-shielding. Absorbed dose in organs and tissues and the effective dose were calculated for males and females. Risk parameters for cancer and other outcomes are presented for selected organs. The results of this intracomparison between ISS Partner Agencies itself provide insights to the level of agreement with which space agencies can perform organ dosimetry and calculate effective dose. This work was performed in collaboration with the advisory and guidance efforts of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Task Group 115 and will be presented in an ICRP Report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example spectra of incident GCR isotopes used by NASA for the 1–30 January, 2013 time frame.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reference SPE proton spectrum proposed by Townsend, et al. as represented by the Band function parameterizations that were modeled by Tylka, et al. (2010).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shielding geometry for example (a) cis-lunar mission and (b) lunar surface mission.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison J., Amako K., Apostolakis A., Arce P., Asai M., Aso T., Bagli E., Bagulya A., Banerjee S., et al. Recent Developments in GEANT4. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2016;835:186–225.
    1. Artemis 2023. https://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/#late
    1. Chappell L. The impact of baseline cancer rates on lifetime risk estimates of space radiation-induced cancer, presentation to the International Society of Radiation Epidemiology and Dosimetry meeting, Sitges, Spain, May 16-18, 2023.
    1. Clowdsley MS, Semones EJ. Solar particle event protection requirements for exploration habitats. Presentation in: Solar Energetic Particles (SEP), Solar Modulation and Space Radiation: New Opportunities in the AMS-02 Era #2, Arlington, Virginia April 24-26, 2017.
    1. Cucinotta FA, Kim MHY, Chappell LJ. Space Radiation Cancer Risk Projections and Uncertainties – 2012. NASA TP-2013- 217375; 2013

LinkOut - more resources