Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 27;15(7):1623.
doi: 10.3390/nu15071623.

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Food Environment at an Australian University Campus

Affiliations

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the Food Environment at an Australian University Campus

Daisy H Coyle et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

University food environments have a strong influence on the dietary choices of students and staff. The aim of this study was to assess the food environment at a large university in Sydney, Australia. Data were collected between March and July 2022 from 27 fixed food outlets and 24 vending machines. The healthiness of the food environment was evaluated using the Healthy Food and Drink in NSW Health Facilities for Staff and Visitors Framework ('Framework'), which assesses food environment parameters including the availability, placement, and promotion of 'Everyday' (healthy) and 'Occasional' (less healthy) products. Each parameter was evaluated overall and across each food outlet type. Across all outlets, Everyday foods and drinks made up 43.9% of all products. Only two outlets met the Framework's product availability benchmark of ≥75% Everyday foods and drinks. A total of 43 outlets (84.3%) sold sugary drinks as part of their product range. Occasional products made up 68.4%, 53.3%, and 59.9% of all items for sale at checkout areas, countertops, and eye-level shelves, respectively. Finally, 79.7% of meal deals included Occasional products. Our findings highlight the need to improve the availability, placement, and promotion of foods and drinks sold at a major university campus in Sydney, Australia.

Keywords: food environment; health star rating; nutrition; sugar-sweetened beverages; university; vending machines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1659–1724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31679-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkes C. Dietary Implications of Supermarket Development: A Global Perspective. Dev. Policy Rev. 2008;26:657–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00428.x. - DOI
    1. Melaku Y.A., Renzaho A., Gill T.K., Taylor A.W., Dal Grande E., de Courten B., Baye E., Gonzalez-Chica D., Hyppönen E., Shi Z., et al. Burden and trend of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Australia and comparison with 34 OECD countries, 1990–2015: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019;58:1299–1313. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1656-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willcox S. Chronic Diseases in Australia: The Case for Changing Course. Australian Health Policy Collaboration; Melbourne, VIC, Australia: 2014.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare . Australia’s Health 2016. Australian Health Policy Collaboration; Canberra, Australia: 2016.

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources