Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 4;14(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s13229-023-00541-w.

Sex differences in social and emotional insight in youth with and without autism

Affiliations

Sex differences in social and emotional insight in youth with and without autism

Hunter Mattern et al. Mol Autism. .

Abstract

Autism was formally recognized by the medical community in the first half of the twentieth century. Almost 100 years later, a small but growing literature has reported sex differences in the behavioral expression of autism. Recent research has also begun to explore the internal experiences of individuals with autism, including social and emotional insight. The current study examines sex differences in language-based markers of social and emotional insight in girls and boys with autism and non-autistic peers during semi-structured clinical interviews. Sixty-four participants aged 5 to 17 years were individually matched on chronological age and full-scale IQ to form four groups: autistic girls, autistic boys, non-autistic girls, and non-autistic boys. Transcribed interviews were scored using four scales that index aspects of social and emotional insight. Results revealed the main effects of diagnosis, such that youth with autism exhibited lower insight than non-autistic youth on scales indexing social cognition and object relations, emotional investment, and social causality. With regards to sex differences, across diagnoses, girls were rated higher than boys on the social cognition and object relations, emotional investment, and social causality scales. Examined within each diagnosis separately, clear sex differences emerged: both autistic and non-autistic girls demonstrated better social cognition and understanding of social causality than boys in their respective diagnostic groups. No within-diagnosis sex differences were found on the emotional insight scales, however. These results suggest that relatively enhanced social cognition and understanding of social causality in girls may be a population-level sex difference that is preserved in autism, despite the core social challenges that characterize this condition. The current findings reveal critical new information about insight into social and emotional thinking and relationships in autistic girls versus boys that have important implications for improving identification and designing effective interventions.

Keywords: ASD; Emotional knowledge; Gender differences; Girls; Social understanding; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Estimated marginal means of ratings on the four scales by sex and diagnosis. Presented above are data from each of the four insight scales, sex means (boy—gray; and girl—white) and diagnosis means (no autism diagnosis and autism diagnosis) are shown. For the figure above, *p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .005. A Results from an ANOVA show that girls were significantly rated higher on insight measured by the five levels of emotional awareness scale, p = .023. Differences between diagnosis, p = .281 and an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .877, were not significant. B Results from an ANOVA show that non-autistic individuals were rated significantly higher than individuals with an autism diagnosis, p = .013. Differences based on sex, p = .058, and an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .798, were not significant. Additionally, differences in girls were found p = .046. C Results from an ANOVA show that non-autistic individuals were rated significantly higher than individuals with an autism diagnosis, p = .028, and sex, p = .001. In the non-autistic group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys, p = .025. Similarly, in the autism diagnosis group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys p = .020. Differences in an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .587, were not significant. Additionally, differences in girls were found p = .044. D Results from an ANOVA show that non-autistic individuals were rated significantly higher than individuals with an autism diagnosis, p = .040, and sex, p = .004. In the non-autistic group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys, p = .038. Similarly, in the autism diagnosis group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys p = .041. Differences in an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .462, were not significant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maenner MJ, Shaw KA, Bakian AV, Bilder DA, Durkin MS, Esler A, et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children Aged 8 Years—Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2018. 2021;70(11):20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Internet]. Fifth Edition. American Psychiatric Association; 2013 [cited 2018 Aug 29]. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
    1. Key Findings: CDC Releases First Estimates of the Number of Adults Living with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the United States [Internet]. 2020 Apr. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/features/adults-living-with-autism-spe...
    1. Loomes R, Hull L, Mandy WPL. What is the male-to-female ratio in autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(6):466–474. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dworzynski K, Ronald A, Bolton P, Happé F. How different are girls and boys above and below the diagnostic threshold for autism spectrum disorders? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;51(8):788–797. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.018. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types