The use of social robots with children and young people on the autism spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35731805
- PMCID: PMC9216612
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269800
The use of social robots with children and young people on the autism spectrum: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Robot-mediated interventions show promise in supporting the development of children on the autism spectrum.
Objectives: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarize key features of available evidence on robot-interventions for children and young people on the autism spectrum aged up to 18 years old, as well as consider their efficacy for specific domains of learning.
Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore. Grey literature was also searched using PsycExtra, OpenGrey, British Library EThOS, and the British Library Catalogue. Databases were searched from inception until April (6th) 2021.
Synthesis methods: Searches undertaken across seven databases yielded 2145 articles. Forty studies met our review inclusion criteria of which 17 were randomized control trials. The methodological quality of studies was conducted with the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. A narrative synthesis summarised the findings. A meta-analysis was conducted with 12 RCTs.
Results: Most interventions used humanoid (67%) robotic platforms, were predominantly based in clinics (37%) followed home, schools and laboratory (17% respectively) environments and targeted at improving social and communication skills (77%). Focusing on the most common outcomes, a random effects meta-analysis of RCTs showed that robot-mediated interventions significantly improved social functioning (g = 0.35 [95%CI 0.09 to 0.61; k = 7). By contrast, robots did not improve emotional (g = 0.63 [95%CI -1.43 to 2.69]; k = 2) or motor outcomes (g = -0.10 [95%CI -1.08 to 0.89]; k = 3), but the numbers of trials were very small. Meta-regression revealed that age accounted for almost one-third of the variance in effect sizes, with greater benefits being found in younger children.
Conclusions: Overall, our findings support the use of robot-mediated interventions for autistic children and youth, and we propose several recommendations for future research to aid learning and enhance implementation in everyday settings.
Prospero registration: Our methods were preregistered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42019148981).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Robot applications for autism: a comprehensive review.Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Aug;16(6):580-602. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1685016. Epub 2020 Jul 24. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021. PMID: 32706602 Review.
-
Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 10;21(5):e13203. doi: 10.2196/13203. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31094357 Free PMC article.
-
Are social robots ready yet to be used in care and therapy of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Oct;129:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021. PMID: 33862066 Review.
-
Humanoid robot-assisted interventions among children with diabetes: A systematic scoping review.Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Nov;111:103749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103749. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020. PMID: 32911362 Review.
Cited by
-
Social robots in research on social and cognitive development in infants and toddlers: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303704. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38748722 Free PMC article. Review.
-
People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Could Interact More Easily with a Robot than with a Human: Reasons and Limits.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 12;14(2):131. doi: 10.3390/bs14020131. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38392485 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the Potential of Robotics Technology for Enhancing Educational for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;13(7):598. doi: 10.3390/bs13070598. Behav Sci (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37504045 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fully robotic social environment for teaching and practicing affective interaction: Case of teaching emotion recognition skills to children with autism spectrum disorder, a pilot study.Front Robot AI. 2023 May 3;10:1088582. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1088582. eCollection 2023. Front Robot AI. 2023. PMID: 37207048 Free PMC article.
-
Digitally assisted diagnostics of autism spectrum disorder.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 1;14:1066284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1066284. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36816410 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Rodgers M, Marshall D, Simmonds M, Le Couteur A, Biswas M, Wright K, et al.. Interventions based on early intensive applied behaviour analysis for autistic children: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England). 2020. Jul;24(35):1. doi: 10.3310/hta24350 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Valadão CT, Goulart C, Rivera H, Caldeira E, Bastos Filho TF, Frizera-Neto A, et al.. Analysis of the use of a robot to improve social skills in children with autism spectrum disorder. Research on Biomedical Engineering. 2016. Apr;32:161–75.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous