Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;127(2):994-1002.
doi: 10.1177/00332941221109109. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Representative Inner Speech Questionnaires

Famira Racy  1 , Alain Morin  2 , Julia Hagerty  3
Affiliations

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Representative Inner Speech Questionnaires

Famira Racy et al. Psychol Rep. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Inner speech is frequently assessed using self-report scales, but their validity is understudied. Uttl et al. (2011) found moderate correlations, perhaps because measures tap into different dimensions of inner speech. We expand on these preliminary results by investigating reliability and concurrent validity of seven inner speech questionnaires in a larger sample. Our results indicate that inner speech questionnaires are reliable but hold moderate concurrent validity, in line with Uttl and colleagues' (2011) results. Specifically, our results suggest that some inner speech scales may capture a general conception of inner speech, while others may assess evaluative components of negative self-talk, self-regulation, and self-reflective processes, but not emotional valence. The results hold implications around further validity investigations of inner speech measures.

Keywords: inner speech; measurement; questionnaires; self-talk; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alderson-Day B., Fernyhough C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 414(5), 931–965. 10.1037/bul0000021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alderson-Day B., Mitrenga K., Wilkinson S., McCarthy-Jones S., Fernyhough C. (2018). The varieties of inner speech questionnaire – Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 48–58. 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brinthaupt T. M., Hein M. B., Kramer T. E. (2009). The self-talk scale: Development, factor analysis, and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 82–92. 10.1080/00223890802484498 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brinthaupt T. M., Morin A., Uttl B. (2022). Comparing incomparables: Response to “Measuring the Frequency of Inner-Experience Characteristics” (Hurlburt et al., 2021). Submitted. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calvete E., Estévez A., Landín C., Martínez Y., Cardeñoso O., Villardón L., Villa A. (2005). Self-talk and affective problems in college students: Valence of thinking and cognitive content specificity. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 56–67. 10.1017/s1138741600004960 - DOI - PubMed