Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic-Dose Heparin vs Standard Prophylactic or Intermediate-Dose Heparins for Thromboprophylaxis in High-risk Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: The HEP-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 34617959
- PMCID: PMC8498934
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6203
Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic-Dose Heparin vs Standard Prophylactic or Intermediate-Dose Heparins for Thromboprophylaxis in High-risk Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: The HEP-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial
Erratum in
-
Omitted Nonauthor Collaborators.JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):239. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7668. JAMA Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 34962508 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Importance: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are at risk for venous and arterial thromboembolism and death. Optimal thromboprophylaxis dosing in high-risk patients is unknown.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of therapeutic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) vs institutional standard prophylactic or intermediate-dose heparins for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Design, setting, and participants: The HEP-COVID multicenter randomized clinical trial recruited hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 with D-dimer levels more than 4 times the upper limit of normal or sepsis-induced coagulopathy score of 4 or greater from May 8, 2020, through May 14, 2021, at 12 academic centers in the US.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to institutional standard prophylactic or intermediate-dose LMWH or unfractionated heparin vs therapeutic-dose enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg subcutaneous, twice daily if creatinine clearance was 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater (0.5 mg/kg twice daily if creatinine clearance was 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) throughout hospitalization. Patients were stratified at the time of randomization based on intensive care unit (ICU) or non-ICU status.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), or death from any cause, and the principal safety outcome was major bleeding at 30 ± 2 days. Data were collected and adjudicated locally by blinded investigators via imaging, laboratory, and health record data.
Results: Of 257 patients randomized, 253 were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [14.0] years; men, 136 [53.8%]; women, 117 [46.2%]); 249 patients (98.4%) met inclusion criteria based on D-dimer elevation and 83 patients (32.8%) were stratified as ICU-level care. There were 124 patients (49%) in the standard-dose vs 129 patients (51%) in the therapeutic-dose group. The primary efficacy outcome was met in 52 of 124 patients (41.9%) (28.2% VTE, 3.2% ATE, 25.0% death) with standard-dose heparins vs 37 of 129 patients (28.7%) (11.7% VTE, 3.2% ATE, 19.4% death) with therapeutic-dose LMWH (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96; P = .03), including a reduction in thromboembolism (29.0% vs 10.9%; RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.66; P < .001). The incidence of major bleeding was 1.6% with standard-dose vs 4.7% with therapeutic-dose heparins (RR, 2.88; 95% CI, 0.59-14.02; P = .17). The primary efficacy outcome was reduced in non-ICU patients (36.1% vs 16.7%; RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.81; P = .004) but not ICU patients (55.3% vs 51.1%; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62-1.39; P = .71).
Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, therapeutic-dose LMWH reduced major thromboembolism and death compared with institutional standard heparin thromboprophylaxis among inpatients with COVID-19 with very elevated D-dimer levels. The treatment effect was not seen in ICU patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04401293.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1621-1622. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6212. JAMA Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 34617968 No abstract available.
-
In high-risk inpatients with COVID-19, therapeutic- vs. standard-dose heparin reduced thromboembolism or death at 30 d.Ann Intern Med. 2022 Feb;175(2):JC17. doi: 10.7326/J21-0019. Epub 2022 Feb 1. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35099994
Similar articles
-
Treatment-Dose LMWH versus Prophylactic/Intermediate Dose Heparins in High-Risk COVID-19 Inpatients: Rationale and Design of the HEP-COVID Trial.Thromb Haemost. 2021 Dec;121(12):1684-1695. doi: 10.1055/a-1475-2351. Epub 2021 May 28. Thromb Haemost. 2021. PMID: 33823560
-
Coagulopathy of hospitalised COVID-19: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Therapeutic Anticoagulation versus Standard Care as a Rapid Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (RAPID COVID COAG - RAPID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2021 Mar 10;22(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05076-0. Trials. 2021. PMID: 33691765 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Intermediate-Dose vs Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation on Thrombotic Events, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Treatment, or Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: The INSPIRATION Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1620-1630. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4152. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33734299 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 1;12(12):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12:CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub5. PMID: 27906452 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 29;(8):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 01;12:CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub4. PMID: 25171736 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors of bleeding and thrombotic events among patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 and elevated D-dimer: insights from the ACTION randomized clinical trial.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 May 18. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-02995-y. Online ahead of print. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024. PMID: 38762708
-
The effect of current antithrombotic therapy on mortality in nursing home residents with COVID-19: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.Age Ageing. 2024 May 1;53(5):afae094. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae094. Age Ageing. 2024. PMID: 38748450 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of thromboembolic complications and outcomes in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.BMC Infect Dis. 2024 May 10;24(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09374-1. BMC Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 38730292 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Apr 26;121(3):e20230470. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230470. eCollection 2024. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38695466 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese.
-
Lessons we learned during the past four challenging years in the COVID-19 era: pharmacotherapy, long COVID complications, and vaccine development.Virol J. 2024 Apr 26;21(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02370-6. Virol J. 2024. PMID: 38671455 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous