Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;26(4):940-950.
doi: 10.1177/13623613211039387. Epub 2021 Sep 18.

Anthropomorphic tendencies in autism: A conceptual replication and extension of White and Remington (2019) and preliminary development of a novel anthropomorphism measure

Affiliations

Anthropomorphic tendencies in autism: A conceptual replication and extension of White and Remington (2019) and preliminary development of a novel anthropomorphism measure

Rachel A Clutterbuck et al. Autism. 2022 May.

Abstract

Anthropomorphism is the tendency to attribute human-like qualities (e.g. thoughts and feelings) to non-human entities (e.g. objects and weather systems). Research by White and Remington (2019) suggested that anthropomorphism is more common in autistic compared to neurotypical adults, which is interesting given that autistic individuals sometimes misunderstand the thoughts and feelings of other people. In this article, we re-examined the link between autism and anthropomorphism in a large sample of adults with varying degrees of autistic traits, with several important methodological advances on previous research. Across two studies, we found that individuals with more autistic traits reported greater anthropomorphic tendencies. As part of these analyses, we had to develop a new, refined measure of anthropomorphism, which showed better reliability and validity than the original measure. This measure will be useful in future autism-related research. Overall, advancing White and Remington's study, these findings help us to better understand individual differences in socially relevant processes, including those that may be enhanced in autism (e.g. anthropomorphism).

Keywords: anthropomorphism; autism; personification; social cognition; theory of mind.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allison C., Auyeung B., Baron-Cohen S. (2012). Toward brief ‘red flags’ for autism screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(2), 202–212. - PubMed
    1. Altman D. G., Royston P. (2006). The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ, 332(7549), Article 1080. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atherton G., Cross L. (2018). Seeing more than human: Autism and anthropomorphic theory of mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 528. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atherton G., Cross L. (2019). Animal Faux Pas: Two legs good four legs bad for theory of mind, but not in the broad autism spectrum. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 180(2–3), 81–95. - PubMed
    1. Clutterbuck R. A., Callan M. J., Taylor E. C., Livingston L. A., Shah P. (2021). Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index. Psychological Assessment, 33(7), 629–636. - PubMed

Publication types