Pragmatics in the False-Belief Task: Let the Robot Ask the Question!
- PMID: 33329255
- PMCID: PMC7719623
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593807
Pragmatics in the False-Belief Task: Let the Robot Ask the Question!
Abstract
The poor performances of typically developing children younger than 4 in the first-order false-belief task "Maxi and the chocolate" is analyzed from the perspective of conversational pragmatics. An ambiguous question asked by an adult experimenter (perceived as a teacher) can receive different interpretations based on a search for relevance, by which children according to their age attribute different intentions to the questioner, within the limits of their own meta-cognitive knowledge. The adult experimenter tells the child the following story of object-transfer: "Maxi puts his chocolate into the green cupboard before going out to play. In his absence, his mother moves the chocolate from the green cupboard to the blue one." The child must then predict where Maxi will pick up the chocolate when he returns. To the child, the question from an adult (a knowledgeable person) may seem surprising and can be understood as a question of his own knowledge of the world, rather than on Maxi's mental representations. In our study, without any modification of the initial task, we disambiguate the context of the question by (1) replacing the adult experimenter with a humanoid robot presented as "ignorant" and "slow" but trying to learn and (2) placing the child in the role of a "mentor" (the knowledgeable person). Sixty-two typical children of 3 years-old completed the first-order false belief task "Maxi and the chocolate," either with a human or with a robot. Results revealed a significantly higher success rate in the robot condition than in the human condition. Thus, young children seem to fail because of the pragmatic difficulty of the first-order task, which causes a difference of interpretation between the young child and the experimenter.
Keywords: first-order false belief task; human robot interaction; humanoid robot; ignorant robot; mentor-child context; pragmatics; preschool children; theory of mind.
Copyright © 2020 Baratgin, Dubois-Sage, Jacquet, Stilgenbauer and Jamet.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/7719623/bin/fpsyg-11-593807-g0001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/7719623/bin/fpsyg-11-593807-g0002.gif)
Similar articles
-
[Theory of mind in Asperger syndrome].Encephale. 2007 Sep;33(4 Pt 1):592-7. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)92058-8. Encephale. 2007. PMID: 18033148 French.
-
Theory of Robot Mind: False Belief Attribution to Social Robots in Children With and Without Autism.Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 9;10:1732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01732. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31447726 Free PMC article.
-
Removing shared information improves 3- and 4-year-olds' performance on a change-of-location explicit false belief task.J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Nov;187:104665. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104665. Epub 2019 Aug 10. J Exp Child Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31409457
-
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009. PMID: 19673160 Review.
-
Growing out of your own mind: Reexamining the development of the self-other difference in the unexpected contents task.Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105403. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105403. Epub 2023 Feb 21. Cognition. 2023. PMID: 36821998 Review.
Cited by
-
People with Autism Spectrum Disorder Could Interact More Easily with a Robot than with a Human: Reasons and Limits.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Feb 12;14(2):131. doi: 10.3390/bs14020131. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38392485 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How the Custom Suppresses the Endowment Effect: Exchange Paradigm in Kanak Country.Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 25;12:785721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785721. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35145459 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Angeleri R., Gabbatore I., Bosco F. M., Sacco K., Colle L. (2016). Pragmatic abilities in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a study with the abaco battery. Miner. Psichiatr. 57, 93–103.
-
- Antonietti A., Sempio O., Marchetti A. (2006). Theory of Mind and Language in Developmental Contexts. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality. New York, NY: Springer New York.
-
- Astington J. W., Olson D. R. (1995). The cognitive revolution in children's understanding of mind. Hum. Dev. 38, 179–189. 10.1159/000278313 - DOI
-
- Bagassi M., Macchi L. (2006). Pragmatic approach to decision making under uncertainty: the case of the disjunction effect. Think. Reason. 12, 329–350. 10.1080/13546780500375663 - DOI
-
- Bagassi M., Salerni N., Castoldi V., Sala V., Caravona L., Poli F., et al. (2020). Improving children's logical and mathematical performance via a pragmatic approach. Front. Educ. 5:54 10.3389/feduc.2020.00054 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources