Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar 3;15(3):e0227255.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227255. eCollection 2020.

There and back again: A zooarchaeological perspective on Early and Middle Bronze Age urbanism in the southern Levant

Jane S Gaastra  1 , Tina L Greenfield  2 , Haskel J Greenfield  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

There and back again: A zooarchaeological perspective on Early and Middle Bronze Age urbanism in the southern Levant

Jane S Gaastra et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Multiple arguments for or against the presence of 'urban' settlements in the Early Bronze Age of the southern Levant have identified the need to compare these settlements against their rural hinterlands through multiple lines of evidence. This meta-analysis of zooarchaeological data from the region compares and identifies patterns of animal production, provisioning and consumption between the supposed "urban" and rural sites of the southern Levant from the Early Bronze (EB) against the (more widely recognised urban) Middle Bronze (MB) Ages. It also identifies distinct and regionally specific patterns in animal production and consumption that can be detected between urban and rural sites of the southern Levant. The taxonomic and age profiles from EB Ia and Ib sites do not demonstrate any urban versus rural differentiation patterning, even though fortifications appear in the EB Ib. Beginning in the EB II and clearly visible in the EB III, there is differentiation between rural and urban sites in the taxonomic and age proportions. Differentiation is repeated in the MB II. The clear differentiation between "urban" and rural zooarchaeological assemblages from the EB II-III and MB suggest that rural sites are provisioning the larger fortified settlements. This pattern indicates that these sites are indeed urban in nature, and these societies are organized at the state-level. From the EB II onwards, there is a clear bias in the large centres towards the consumption of cattle and of subadult sheep and goats with a corresponding bias in smaller rural sites towards the consumption of adult sheep and goats and a reduced presence of cattle. After the emergence of this differential pattern, it disappears with the decline in social complexity at the end of the Early Bronze Age, only to come 'back again' with the re-emergence of urban settlement systems in the Middle Bronze Age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Location of the sites used in this study.
Further details on these sites are available in Table 2. Basemap: Stamen Terrain (obtained through QuickMapServices QGIS plugin), (cc) OpenStreetMap contributors.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Correspondence analyses of taxonomic distributions for Phases 1 through 4.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Stripcharts indicating the proportional representation of wild taxa as well as of cattle and pigs within domesticates for each phase.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Correspondence analyses of taxonomic distributions for Phases 5 through 8.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Ternary diagams of dental age profiles for sheep and goats from sites in this study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. de Miroschedji P. Yarmuth: the dawn of city-states in southern Canaan. Near Eastern Archaeology. 1999;62(1):2–19. 10.2307/3210719 - DOI
    1. de Miroschedji P. The Southern Levant (Cisjordan) during the Early Bronze Age In: Steiner ML, Killebrew AE, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant c. 8000-332 BCE. Oxford Handbooks in Archaeology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p.308–328.
    1. Greenberg R. Early Urbanization in the Levant: A Regional Narrative New Approaches to Anthropological Archaeology. Leicester: Leicester University Press; 2002.
    1. Richard S. The Early Bronze Age of the Southern Levant In: Richard S, editor. Near Eastern Archaeology: A Reader. Winona Lake (IN): Eisenbrauns; 2003. p. 280–296.
    1. Algaze G. Ancient Mesopotamia at the Dawn of Civilization: the evolution of an Urban Landscape Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008.

Grants and funding

We would like to acknowledge the following organisations for generously funding and supporting our research for this article: the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, The University of Manitoba (St. Paul’s College and the Near Eastern and Biblical Archaeology Laboratory), St. Thomas More College of the University of Saskatchewan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.