Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Sep;32(6):617-627.
doi: 10.1037/adb0000383. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

The effect of laboratory manipulations of negative affect on alcohol craving and use: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effect of laboratory manipulations of negative affect on alcohol craving and use: A meta-analysis

Konrad Bresin et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Scientific and lay theories propose that negative affect plays a causal role in problematic alcohol use. Despite this common belief, supporting experimental evidence has been mixed. Thus, the goals of this study were to (a) meta-analytically quantify the degree to which experimentally manipulated negative affect influenced alcohol use and craving in the laboratory, (b) examine whether the size of this effect depended on key manipulation characteristics (i.e., self-relevance of the stressor, timing of the end of the stressor, and strength of negative affect induction) or sample characteristics (i.e., substance use history). Across 41 studies (N = 2,403), we found small-to-medium effects for more use (dav = .31, 95% confidence interval; CI [.11, .50]) and craving (dav = .39, 95% CI [.04, .74]) following a negative affect manipulation than a control manipulation. We also found a significant increase in craving from pre- to postaffect induction (dav = .36, 95% CI [.14, .58]). This suggests the mixed results from the prior literature were likely because of statistically underpowered studies. The moderator hypotheses received weak support, with few significant results in the predicted direction. Our meta-analysis provides clarity about a previously inconclusive set of results and highlights the need for more ecologically valid manipulations of affect in future work. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of Study Search Strategy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bacon AK, Cranford AN, Blumenthal H. Effects of ostracism and sex on alcohol consumption in a clinical laboratory setting. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2015;29:664–672. - PubMed
    1. Bacon AK, Thomas SE. Stress reactivity, social anxiety, and alcohol consumption in people with alcoholism: A laboratory study. Journal of Dual Diagnosis. 2013;9:107–114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker TB, Piper ME, McCarthy DE, Majeskie MR, Fiore MC. Addiction motivation reformulated: An affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychological Review. 2004;111:33–51. - PubMed
    1. Birch CD, Stewart SH, Wall A, McKee SA, Eisnor SJ, Theakston JA. Mood-induced increases in alcohol expectancy strength in internally motivated drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2004;18:231–238. - PubMed
    1. Brady KT, Back SE, Waldrop AE, McRae AL, Anton RF, Upadhyaya HP, … Randall PK. Cold pressor task reactivity: Predictors of alcohol use among alcohol-dependent individuals with and without comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2006;30:938–946. - PubMed

Publication types