Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

C A C Prinsen  1   2 , L B Mokkink  3 , L M Bouter  3 , J Alonso  4 , D L Patrick  5 , H C W de Vet  3 , C B Terwee  3
Affiliations

COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

C A C Prinsen et al. Qual Life Res. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each PROM). In the absence of guidance specifically designed for reviews on measurement properties, our aim was to develop a guideline for conducting systematic reviews of PROMs.

Methods: Based on literature reviews and expert opinions, and in concordance with existing guidelines, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) steering committee developed a guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs.

Results: A consecutive ten-step procedure for conducting a systematic review of PROMs is proposed. Steps 1-4 concern preparing and performing the literature search, and selecting relevant studies. Steps 5-8 concern the evaluation of the quality of the eligible studies, the measurement properties, and the interpretability and feasibility aspects. Steps 9 and 10 concern formulating recommendations and reporting the systematic review.

Conclusions: The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice.

Keywords: COSMIN; Measurement properties; Methodology; Outcome measurement instrument; Outcome measures; PROM; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ten steps for conducting a systematic review of PROMs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2009). Guidance for Industry. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm193282.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
    1. Griffiths C, Armstrong-James L, White P, Rumsey N, Pleat J, Harcourt D. A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in child and adolescent burn research. Burns. 2015;41(2):212–224. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.07.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hermans H, van der Pas FH, Evenhuis HM. Instruments assessing anxiety in adults with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2011;32(3):861–870. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keage M, Delatycki M, Corben L, Vogel A. A systematic review of self-reported swallowing assessments in progressive neurological disorders. Dysphagia. 2015;30(1):27–46. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9579-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ritmala-Castren M, Lakanmaa RL, Virtanen I, Leino-Kilpi H. Evaluating adult patients’ sleep: An integrative literature review in critical care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2014;28(3):435–448. doi: 10.1111/scs.12072. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources