Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;13(1):36-61.
doi: 10.1177/1745691617709589. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation

Nicholas T Van Dam  1   2 , Marieke K van Vugt  3 , David R Vago  4 , Laura Schmalzl  5 , Clifford D Saron  6 , Andrew Olendzki  7 , Ted Meissner  8 , Sara W Lazar  9 , Catherine E Kerr  10 , Jolie Gorchov  11 , Kieran C R Fox  12 , Brent A Field  13 , Willoughby B Britton  14 , Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis  15 , David E Meyer  16
Affiliations

Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation

Nicholas T Van Dam et al. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Letter to the Editor: Miscommunicating Mindfulness.
    Van Dam NT, van Vugt M, Vago DR, Schmalzl L, Saron CD, Olendzki A, Meissner T, Lazar SW, Gorchov J, Fox KCR, Field BA, Britton W, Brefczynski-Lewis J, Meyer DE. Van Dam NT, et al. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1289-1290. doi: 10.1177/1745691620924057. Epub 2020 Aug 4. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32750262 No abstract available.

Abstract

During the past two decades, mindfulness meditation has gone from being a fringe topic of scientific investigation to being an occasional replacement for psychotherapy, tool of corporate well-being, widely implemented educational practice, and "key to building more resilient soldiers." Yet the mindfulness movement and empirical evidence supporting it have not gone without criticism. Misinformation and poor methodology associated with past studies of mindfulness may lead public consumers to be harmed, misled, and disappointed. Addressing such concerns, the present article discusses the difficulties of defining mindfulness, delineates the proper scope of research into mindfulness practices, and explicates crucial methodological issues for interpreting results from investigations of mindfulness. For doing so, the authors draw on their diverse areas of expertise to review the present state of mindfulness research, comprehensively summarizing what we do and do not know, while providing a prescriptive agenda for contemplative science, with a particular focus on assessment, mindfulness training, possible adverse effects, and intersection with brain imaging. Our goals are to inform interested scientists, the news media, and the public, to minimize harm, curb poor research practices, and staunch the flow of misinformation about the benefits, costs, and future prospects of mindfulness meditation.

Keywords: adverse effects; contemplative science; media hype; meditation; mindfulness; misinformation; neuroimaging; psychotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scientific and news media articles on mindfulness and/or meditation by year from 1970 – 2015. Empirical scientific articles (black line) with the term “mindfulness” or “meditation” in the abstract, title, or keywords, published between 1970 and 2015 were searched using Scopus. Media pieces (dashed gray line) with the terms “mindfulness” or “meditation”, published in newspapers, using a similarity filter to minimize double-counting, published between 1970 and 2015 were searched using LexisNexis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Articles in academic journals by content type. Scopus search limited to articles in academic journals only, published between 1970 and 2014, keywords “mindfulness” or “meditation” for overall search. Brain NOT Questionnaire and Questionnaire NOT Brain as additional key terms.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adler C, Craske M, Barlow D. Relaxation-induced panic: When resting isn't peaceful. Integrative Psychiatry. 1987;9:94–112.
    1. Agbabiaka TB, Savovic J, Ernst E. Methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Safety. 2008;31:21–37. - PubMed
    1. Agee JD, Danoff-Burg S, Grant CA. Comparing brief stress management courses in a community sample: Mindfulness skills and progressive muscle relaxation. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing. 2009;5:104–109. - PubMed
    1. Arch JJ, Ayers CR, Baker A, Almklov E, Dean DJ, Craske MG. Randomized clinical trial of adapted mindfulness-based stress reduction versus group cognitive behavioral therapy for heterogeneous anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2013;51:185–196. - PubMed
    1. Analayo B. Sattipatthana: The direct path to realization. Birmingham: Windhorse Publications; 2003.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources