Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?
- PMID: 28024653
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.12.006
Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?
Abstract
Background: In 1992, Congress implemented a relative value unit (RVU) payment system to set reimbursement for all procedures covered by Medicare. In 1997, data supported that a significant gender bias existed in reimbursement for gynecologic compared to urologic procedures. The present study was performed to compare work and total RVU's for gender specific procedures effective January 2015 and to evaluate if time has healed the gender-based RVU worth.
Methods: Using the 2015 CPT codes, we compared work and total RVU's for 50 pairs of gender specific procedures. We also evaluated 2015 procedure related provider compensation. The groups were matched so that the procedures were anatomically similar. We also compared 2015 to 1997 RVU and fee schedules.
Results: Evaluation of work RVU's for the paired procedures revealed that in 36 cases (72%), male vs female procedures had a higher wRVU and tRVU. For total fee/reimbursement, 42 (84%) male based procedures were compensated at a higher rate than the paired female procedures. On average, male specific surgeries were reimbursed at an amount that was 27.67% higher for male procedures than for female-specific surgeries. Female procedure based work RVU's have increased minimally from 1997 to 2015.
Conclusion: Time and effort have trended towards resolution of some gender-related procedure worth discrepancies but there are still significant RVU and compensation differences that should be further reviewed and modified as surgical time and effort highly correlate.
Keywords: CPT code; Compensation; Gender bias; MACRA; RUC; RVU.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared With Male-Specific Procedures Over Time.Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Dec 1;138(6):878-883. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004599. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34736273 Free PMC article.
-
Discrepancies Created by Surgeon Self-Reported Operative Time and the Effects on Procedural Relative Value Units and Reimbursement.Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):182-188. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004467. Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34237766 Review.
-
Reimbursement for surgical procedures in gynecologic oncology.Curr Opin Oncol. 2001 Sep;13(5):390-3. doi: 10.1097/00001622-200109000-00013. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11555718 Review.
-
Comparison of 1997 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: is Adam still worth more than Eve?Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Aug;66(2):313-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4775. Gynecol Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9264582
-
Is Adam worth more than Eve? The financial impact of gender bias in the federal reimbursement of gynecological procedures.Gynecol Oncol. 1997 Mar;64(3):372-7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1996.4607. Gynecol Oncol. 1997. PMID: 9062137
Cited by
-
Surgical sexism in Canada: structural bias in reimbursement of surgical care for women.Can J Surg. 2023 Jul 4;66(4):E341-E347. doi: 10.1503/cjs.022121. Print 2023 Jul-Aug. Can J Surg. 2023. PMID: 37402558 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in Operative Time and Work Relative Value Units in Gynecologic Surgery.Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1145-1148. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004800. Epub 2022 May 2. Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35675612 Free PMC article.
-
Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician-gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jun;62(3):349-357. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13511. Epub 2022 Mar 16. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 35293613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review.Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;164(3):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.032. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Gynecol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35000796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Out-of-network bills among privately insured patients undergoing hysterectomy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):543.e1-543.e45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.027. Epub 2021 Nov 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34774823 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical