A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Folds
- PMID: 26910660
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479965.14775.f0
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Folds
Abstract
Background: Hyaluronic acid dermal fillers are most frequently used for unwanted wrinkles. Recently, lidocaine has been incorporated into hyaluronic acid fillers to reduce injection discomfort.
Methods: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, intraindividual trial was designed to compare a new lidocaine-containing monophasic hyaluronic acid filler (Neuramis Deep Lidocaine) with a lidocaine-containing biphasic hyaluronic acid filler (Restylane Perlane-L) in moderate to severe nasolabial folds. Fifty-eight patients with moderate to severe nasolabial folds were randomized to an injection of Neuramis or Perlane-L in the left or right side of the face. Clinical efficacy and safety were assessed by blinded investigators, independent expert panels, and patients based on the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale at weeks 8, 16, and 24 after the injection.
Results: Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale improvement from baseline with Neuramis (1.64 ± 0.74) was significantly greater than with Perlane-L (1.45 ± 0.54) at week 24 (p < 0.05). The mean Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score at week 24 was 2.36 ± 0.55 for Neuramis and 2.00 ± 0.50 for Perlane-L (p < 0.05). However, the difference in pain reduction between Neuramis- and Perlane-L-treated sides was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of Neuramis are comparable to those of Perlane-L in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale improvement for the management of nasolabial folds. Furthermore, the difference in pain reduction between the two fillers was not clinically significant.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, I.
Comment in
-
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Folds.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Dec;138(6):1071e-1072e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002798. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 27537236 No abstract available.
-
Correction of Nasolabial Folds Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler Plus Subcutaneous Injections of Carbon Dioxide.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Dec;138(6):1070e-1071e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002797. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016. PMID: 27537239 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Monophasic and Biphasic Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Esthetic Correction of Nasolabial Folds: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1407-1422. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02729-y. Epub 2022 Jan 23. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35066619 Review.
-
Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid filler for nasolabial folds: A 52-week, multicenter, randomized, evaluator/subject-blind, split-face study.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 May;20(5):1467-1473. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13773. Epub 2020 Oct 21. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33085170 Clinical Trial.
-
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new monophasic hyaluronic acid filler with lidocaine 0.3% in the correction of nasolabial fold.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Sep;16(3):327-332. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12310. Epub 2017 Feb 1. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28145073 Clinical Trial.
-
Injectable Filler Techniques for Facial Rejuvenation, Volumization, and Augmentation.Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015 Nov;23(4):479-88. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2015.07.004. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 26505544 Review.
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine-Containing Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Study.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Dec;39(6):953-62. doi: 10.1007/s00266-015-0571-z. Epub 2015 Oct 22. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015. PMID: 26493557 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Monophasic and Biphasic Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Esthetic Correction of Nasolabial Folds: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1407-1422. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02729-y. Epub 2022 Jan 23. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35066619 Review.
-
Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;45(5):2300-2316. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5. Epub 2021 Jul 13. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 34255156 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative Analyses of Inflammatory Response and Tissue Integration of 14 Hyaluronic Acid-Based Fillers in Mini Pigs.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jul 2;14:765-778. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S315076. eCollection 2021. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 34239313 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of Hyaluronidase-Mediated Degradation Among Seven Hyaluronic Acid Fillers in Hairless Mice.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Mar 8;14:241-248. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S300960. eCollection 2021. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33727845 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cohen JL, Dayan SH, Brandt FS, et al. Systematic review of clinical trials of small- and large-gel-particle hyaluronic acid injectable fillers for aesthetic soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39:205–231
-
- Prager W, Wissmueller E, Havermann I, et al. A prospective, split-face, randomized, comparative study of safety and 12-month longevity of three formulations of hyaluronic acid dermal filler for treatment of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:1143–1150
-
- Brandt FS, Cazzaniga A. Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3:153–159
-
- Wahl G. European evaluation of a new hyaluronic acid filler incorporating lidocaine. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7:298–303
-
- Monheit GD, Campbell RM, Neugent H, et al. Reduced pain with use of proprietary hyaluronic acid with lidocaine for correction of nasolabial folds: A patient-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:94–101
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials