Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb;57(2):116-31.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12451. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

Research Review: Executive function deficits in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Research Review: Executive function deficits in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - a meta-analysis

Danielle Kingdon et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-like symptoms are common in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). FASD and ADHD groups both display executive function impairments; however, there is ongoing debate whether the pattern and magnitude of executive function deficits differs between these two types of disorders.

Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted (PubMed, PsychInfo; 1972-2013) to identify studies comparing the executive functioning of children with FASD with ADHD or control groups. FASD groups included those with and without dysmorphy (i.e., FAS, pFAS, ARND, and other FASD diagnoses). Effect sizes (Hedges' g, standardized mean difference) were calculated. Random effects meta-analytic models were performed using the metafor package for R.

Results: Fifty-one studies met inclusion criteria (FASD N = 2,115; ADHD N = 453; controls N = 1,990). Children with FASD showed the strongest and most consistent deficits in planning, fluency, and set-shifting compared to controls (Hedges' g = -0.94, -0.78) and children with ADHD (Hedges' g = -0.72, -0.32). FASD was associated with moderate to large impairments in working memory, compared to controls (Hedges' g = -.84, -.58) and small impairments relative to groups with ADHD (Hedges' g = -.26). Smaller and less consistent deficits were found on measures of inhibition and vigilance relative to controls (Hedges' g = -0.52, -0.31); FASD and ADHD were not differentiated on these measures. Moderator analyses indicated executive dysfunction was associated with older age, dysmorphy, and larger group differences in IQ. Sex and diagnostic system were not consistently related to effect size.

Conclusions: While FASD is associated with global executive impairments, executive function weaknesses are most consistent for measures of planning, fluency, and set-shifting. Neuropsychological measures assessing these executive function domains may improve differential diagnosis and treatment of FASD.

Keywords: Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; executive function; meta-analysis; neuropsychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The figure represents a forest plot for the average effect size (Hedges’ g) of the effect executive function (fluency, inhibition, and planning) between groups with FASD compared to healthy controls. Studies were weighted by sample size, and larger filled squares for the effect size estimate represent larger samples. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. *Outlier effect size. (B) The figure represents a forest plot for the average effect size (Hedges’ g) of the effect executive function (set-shifting, vigilance, working memory) between groups with FASD compared to healthy controls. Studies were weighted by sample size, and larger filled squares for the effect size estimate represent larger samples. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. WM=working memory
Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) The figure represents a forest plot for the average effect size (Hedges’ g) of the effect executive function (fluency, inhibition, and planning) between groups with FASD compared to healthy controls. Studies were weighted by sample size, and larger filled squares for the effect size estimate represent larger samples. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. *Outlier effect size. (B) The figure represents a forest plot for the average effect size (Hedges’ g) of the effect executive function (set-shifting, vigilance, working memory) between groups with FASD compared to healthy controls. Studies were weighted by sample size, and larger filled squares for the effect size estimate represent larger samples. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. WM=working memory
Figure 2
Figure 2
The figure represents a forest plot for the average effect size (Hedges’ g) of the effect executive function between FASD nondysmorphic groups compared to healthy controls. Studies were weighted by sample size, and larger filled squares for the effect size estimate represent larger samples. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. WM=working memory
Figure 3
Figure 3
The figure represents a forest plot for the average effect size (Hedges’ g) of the effect executive function between FASD nondysmorphic groups compared to healthy controls. Studies were weighted by sample size, and larger filled squares for the effect size estimate represent larger samples. Error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. WM=working memory

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Substance Abuse and Committee on Children With Disabilities. Fetal alcohol syndrome and alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatrics. 2000;106:358–361. - PubMed
    1. Anderson P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology. 2002;8:71–82. - PubMed
    1. Aragón AS, Kalberg WO, Buckley D, Barela-Scott LM, Tabachnick BG, May PA. Neuropsychological study of FASD in a sample of American Indian children: Processing simple versus complex information. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2008;32:2136–2148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Astley SJ. Diagnostic guide for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: The 4-digit diagnostic code. 3. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Publication Services; 2004.
    1. Astley SJ, Aylward EH, Olson HC, Kerns K, Brooks A, Coggins TE, … Richards T. Functional magnetic resonance imaging outcomes from a comprehensive magnetic resonance study of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders. 2009;1:61–80. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms