Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
- PMID: 26134548
- DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
Abstract
Reviews of primary research are becoming more common as evidence-based practice gains recognition as the benchmark for care, and the number of, and access to, primary research sources has grown. One of the newer review types is the 'scoping review'. In general, scoping reviews are commonly used for 'reconnaissance' - to clarify working definitions and conceptual boundaries of a topic or field. Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed, or exhibits a complex or heterogeneous nature not amenable to a more precise systematic review of the evidence. While scoping reviews may be conducted to determine the value and probable scope of a full systematic review, they may also be undertaken as exercises in and of themselves to summarize and disseminate research findings, to identify research gaps, and to make recommendations for the future research. This article briefly introduces the reader to scoping reviews, how they are different to systematic reviews, and why they might be conducted. The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the Joanna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.
Similar articles
-
What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;5(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5. Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27842604 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):147-53. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26317388
-
Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):170-8. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000063. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26288063
-
Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):163-9. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000064. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015. PMID: 26262566
-
What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1386-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 27. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009. PMID: 19328488 Review.
Cited by
-
Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors and Primary Prevention Strategies for Cardiovascular Diseases in a Middle-Income Country: A Scoping Review and Implication for Future Research.J Prev (2022). 2024 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00782-2. Online ahead of print. J Prev (2022). 2024. PMID: 38839738 Review.
-
Hard drugs use and tooth wear: a scoping review.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jun 1;28(6):348. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05738-8. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38822934 Review.
-
Clinical dimensions of people with co-occurring obsessive-compulsive and related disorders and multiple sclerosis: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 May 30;14(5):e074929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074929. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38816059 Free PMC article.
-
Conceptualisation and Role of Market Access in Pharmaceutical Industry: A Scoping Review.J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 May 1;12(2):81-99. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12020007. eCollection 2024 Jun. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024. PMID: 38808312 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multi-dimensional impact of COVID-19 on active mobility in urban China: a scoping review of empirical knowledge.Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1398340. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398340. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38799676 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources