Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours
- PMID: 22269063
- PMCID: PMC4778078
- DOI: 10.1017/S1368980011002898
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours
Abstract
Objective: To assess current beverage consumption patterns and anticipated reaction to an added 20 % tax on these products.
Design: A random-digit dialled telephone interview lasting 20 min was administered to assess demographics, beverage consumption behaviours and intentions regarding consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in the event of an additional tax on these beverages.
Setting: Respondents were recruited throughout the USA.
Subjects: The study included 592 adults.
Results: Sixty-nine per cent of respondents reported consuming at least one pre-packaged sugar-sweetened beverage in the past week; those who consumed sugar-sweetened beverages averaged seven pre-packaged beverages per week. Ninety-one per cent knew that frequent consumption of soft drinks increases risk of obesity. Thirty-six per cent supported a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages with greatest support among those aged 18-24 years, those with BMI < 30 kg/m2 and those with higher levels of education (P < 0·05). Over one-third of respondents said that they would cut back on their sweetened beverage consumption in the event of an added 20 % tax on these beverages.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that an added tax on these beverages could influence some to cut down on their consumption, reducing their risk of obesity and related illnesses.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Demand and Tax Simulation for Federal Food Assistance Participants: A Case of Two New England States.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Aug;16(4):549-558. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0399-1. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018. PMID: 29916153
-
Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 18;14(4):e1002283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283. eCollection 2017 Apr. PLoS Med. 2017. PMID: 28419108 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary sugar and body weight: have we reached a crisis in the epidemic of obesity and diabetes?: health be damned! Pour on the sugar.Diabetes Care. 2014 Apr;37(4):950-6. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2085. Diabetes Care. 2014. PMID: 24652725 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Drinking to our health: can beverage companies cut calories while maintaining profits?Obes Rev. 2012 Mar;13(3):258-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00949.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10. Obes Rev. 2012. PMID: 22070346 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue.Prev Med. 2011 Jun;52(6):413-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 3. Prev Med. 2011. PMID: 21443899
Cited by
-
Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: Knowledge, beliefs and where should the money go?Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(8):e28226. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28226. eCollection 2024 Apr 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38638996 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Concerning Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Beverage Taxation among Saudi University Students.Nutrients. 2023 Sep 26;15(19):4151. doi: 10.3390/nu15194151. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37836435 Free PMC article.
-
Australians support for policy initiatives addressing unhealthy diet: a population-based study.Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3):daad036. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad036. Health Promot Int. 2023. PMID: 37216315 Free PMC article.
-
An umbrella review of the acceptability of fiscal and pricing policies to reduce diet-related noncommunicable disease.Nutr Rev. 2023 Sep 11;81(10):1351-1372. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad011. Nutr Rev. 2023. PMID: 36857083 Free PMC article.
-
Are intentions to change, policy awareness, or health knowledge related to changes in dietary intake following a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in South Africa? A before-and-after study.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Oct 28;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01370-5. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022. PMID: 36307849 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, et al. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:561–578. - PubMed
-
- National Cancer Institute. Fact Sheet; Obesity and Cancer: Questions and Answers. [accessed October 2010];2004 http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/obesity.
-
- Goldman D, Michaud CP, Lakdawalla D, et al. The fiscal consequences of trends in population health. Natl Tax J. 2010;63:307–330.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous