Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;144(2):920-929.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.013.

Connectivity of the Asiatic wild ass population in the Mongolian Gobi

Affiliations

Connectivity of the Asiatic wild ass population in the Mongolian Gobi

Petra Kaczensky et al. Biol Conserv. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Long-distance migrations of wildlife have been identified as important biological phenomena, but their conservation remains a major challenge. The Mongolian Gobi is one of the last refuges for the Asiatic wild ass (Equus hemionus) and other threatened migratory mammals. Using historic and current distribution ranges, population genetics, and telemetry data we assessed the connectivity of the wild ass population in the context of natural and anthropogenic landscape features and the existing network of protected areas. In the Mongolian Gobi mean biomass production is highly correlated with human and livestock density and seems to predict wild ass occurrence at the upper level. The current wild ass distribution range largely falls into areas below the 250 gC/m(2)/year productivity isoline, suggesting that under the present land use more productive areas have become unavailable for wild asses. Population genetics results identified two subpopulations and delineated a genetic boundary between the Dzungarian and Transaltai Gobi for which the most likely explanation are the mountain ranges separating the two areas. Home ranges and locations of 19 radiomarked wild asses support the assumed restricting effects of more productive habitats and mountain ranges and additionally point towards a barrier effect of fences. Furthermore, telemetry data shows that in the Dzungarian and Transaltai Gobi individual wild ass rarely ventured outside of the protected areas, whereas in the southeast Gobi asses only spend a small fraction of their time within the protected area network. Conserving the continuity of the wild ass population will need a landscape level approach, also including multi-use landscapes outside of protected areas, particularly in the southeast Gobi. In the southwest Gobi, allowing for openings in the border fence to China and managing the border area as an ecological corridor would connect three large protected areas together covering over 70,000 km(2) of wild ass habitat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
GPS locations and ranges of 18 Asiatic wild asses in the Dzungarian, Transaltai, and southeast Gobi of Mongolia 2002–2008. Grey lines delineate the three geo-biographical areas of the Mongolian Gobi. KNR = Kalimalai Nature Reserve, GGA = Great Gobi A strictly protected area, GGB = Great Gobi B strictly protected area, GGS = Gobi Gurvan Saikhan National Park, SGA = Small Gobi A strictly protected area, SGB = Small Gobi B strictly protected area.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between biomass production (expressed in grams of carbon per square meter and year (gC/m2/years)) and human population- and livestock density (expressed as sheep forage units (sfu*)) in the 24 Gobi districts (sums) of Mongolia. *1 sfu is the amount of dry forage needed to feed an average Mongolian sheep for 1 year, which is approximately 365 kg (Fernandez-Gimenez 1999). The equivalencies for the other species are: 1 camel = 5 sfu, 1 horse = 7 sfu, 1 cow/yak = 6 sfu, 1 goat = 0.9 sfu.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Synthesis map combining geographical and genetic data. To delineate the spatial organization of the populations, we combined geographical and genetic data. The synthesis map shows the average proportion of membership of each sample to the two subpopulations based on the CLUMPP analysis (dark red = 0% Dzungarian Gobi/100% southeast Gobi; dark blue = 100% Dzungarian Gobi/0% southeast Gobi). The samples are geo-referenced and the membership surface between the samples was interpolated using the kriging procedure available in the program SurGeE 1.4.0 (http://www.geocities.com/miroslavdressler/surgemain.htm). (A) 2-dimensional view of colour coded isolines of equal proportions, (B) 3-dimensional view with same colour coding and average proportions of membership for z-value (high z-values delineate samples with a high membership value for the southeast Gobi, low z-values delineate samples with a low membership value for the southeast Gobi). The numbers at the base of the graph provide the geographic coordinates.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) Connectivity and extent of suitable wild ass habitat (light green) in the Gobi regions of Mongolian and northern China under the present land use intensity. Protected areas are marked with a green outline. Unsuitable areas, such as areas of high productivity (as a proxy for human/livestock density) are coloured black. Anthropogenic barriers are marked red and natural barriers in the form of steep slopes in orange. White- and light grey-areas delineate habitat believed to be marginal due to very low productivity and mountains, respectively. (B) Insert: The connectivity of wild ass habitat in the southwest could be enhanced by removing the border fence or by at least allowing for openings at strategic points. Declaring the border area an “ecological corridor” would link three large protected areas in central Asia which together cover 61,000 km2. Blue arrows mark the most likely movement corridors for Asiatic wild asses between the three protected areas.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ali S.H. Introduction: a natural connection between ecology and peace? In: Ali S.H., editor. Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 2007. pp. 1–18.
    1. Berger J. The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals. Conservation Biology. 2004;18:320–331.
    1. Bolger D.T., Newmark W.D., Morrison T.A., Doak D.F. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecological Letters. 2007;11:63–77. - PubMed
    1. Clark E.L., Munkhbat J., Dulamtseren S., Baillie J.E.M., Batsaikhan N., Samiya R., Stubbe M. Zoological Society of London; London: 2006. Mongolian Red List of Mammals. Regional Red List Series, vol. 1.
    1. Clevenger A.P., Huijser M.P. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); Washington, DC, USA: 2009. Handbook for Design and Evaluation of Wildlife Crossing Structures in North America. < http://www.westerntransportationinstitute.org/documents/reports/425259_F...>.

LinkOut - more resources