Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jan;55(1):29-37.
doi: 10.1136/jech.55.1.29.

Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults

J A Pryer  1 , R Nichols, P Elliott, B Thakrar, E Brunner, M Marmot
Affiliations

Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults

J A Pryer et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Jan.

Abstract

Study objectives: To identify groups within the UK male and female population who report similar patterns of diet.

Design: National representative dietary survey, using seven day weighed dietary records, of men and women aged 16-64 years living in private households in Great Britain in 1986-7. Cluster analysis was used to aggregate participants into diet groups.

Setting: Great Britain.

Participants: 1087 men and 1110 women.

Results: 93% of men and 86% of women fell into one of four distinct diet groups. Among men the most prevalent diet group was "beer and convenience food" (34% of the male population); second was "traditional British diet" (18%); third was "healthier but sweet diet" (17.5%) and fourth was "healthier diet " (17%). Among women, the most prevalent diet group was " traditional British diet" (32%); second, was "healthy cosmopolitan diet" (25%); third was a "convenience food diet" (21%); and fourth was "healthier but sweet diet" (15%). There were important differences in nutrient profile, sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics between diet groups.

Conclusions: Cluster analysis identified four diet groups among men and four among women, which differed not only in terms of reported dietary intakes, but also with respect to nutrient, social and behavioural profiles. The groups identified could provide a useful basis for development, monitoring and targeting of public health nutrition policy in the UK.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 May;35(5 Suppl):1319-25 - PubMed
    1. J Am Diet Assoc. 1982 Dec;81(6):687-94 - PubMed
    1. J Am Diet Assoc. 1986 May;86(5):616-24 - PubMed
    1. J Am Diet Assoc. 1987 Jul;87(7):897-903 - PubMed
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Sep;17(3):548-55 - PubMed

Publication types