Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Spring;43(1):116-33.
doi: 10.1111/jlme.12200.

Detecting, preventing, and responding to "fraudsters" in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs

Jennifer E F Teitcher  1 , Walter O Bockting, José A Bauermeister, Chris J Hoefer, Michael H Miner, Robert L Klitzman
Affiliations

Detecting, preventing, and responding to "fraudsters" in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs

Jennifer E F Teitcher et al. J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Spring.

Abstract

Internet-based health research is increasing, and often offers financial incentives but fraudulent behavior by participants can result. Specifically, eligible or ineligible individuals may enter the study multiple times and receive undeserved financial compensation. We review past experiences and approaches to this problem and propose several new strategies. Researchers can detect and prevent Internet research fraud in four broad ways: (1) through the questionnaire/instrument (e.g., including certain questions in survey; and software for administering survey); (2) through participants' non-questionnaire data and seeking external validation (e.g., checking data for same email addresses, usernames, passwords, and/or fake addresses or phone numbers; (3) through computer information, (e.g., IP addresses and cookies), and 4) through study design (e.g., avoid lump sum compensation and interviewing participants). These approaches each have pros and cons, and raise ethical, legal, and logistical questions, given that ethical tensions can emerge between preserving the integrity of research vs. protecting the privacy and confidentiality of study respondents. While past discussions concerning the ethics of online research have tended to focus on the participants' ability to trust the researchers, needs now arise to examine researchers' abilities to trust the participants. This analysis has several critical implications for future practice, policy, and research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pequegnat W, Simon Rosser BR, Bowen AM, Bull SS, DiClemente RJ, Bockting WO, Elford J, et al. Conducting Internet-based HIV/STD Prevention Survey Research: Considerations in Design and Evaluation. AIDS and Behavior. 2007;11(4):505–521. - PubMed
    1. Bauermeister JA, Pingel E, Zimmerman M, Couper M, Carballo-Diéguez A, Strecher VJ. Data Quality in HIV/AIDS Web-Based Surveys Handling Invalid and Suspicious Data. Field Methods. 2012;24(3):272–291. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Bauermeister JA, Zimmerman MA, Johns MM, Glowacki P, Stoddard S, Volz E. Innovative Recruitment Using Online Networks: Lessons Learned from an Online Study of Alcohol and Other Drug Use Utilizing a Web-Based, Respondent-Driven Sampling (webRDS) Strategy. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2012;73(5):834. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Bowen AM, Daniel CM, Williams ML, Baird GL. Identifying Multiple Submissions in Internet Research: Preserving Data Integrity. AIDS and Behavior. 2008;12(6):964–973. - PMC - PubMed
    4. Kraut R, Olson J, Banaji M, Bruckman A, Cohen J, Couper M. Psychological Research Online: Report of Board of Scientific Affairs’ Advisory Group on the Conduct of Research on the Internet. American Psychologist. 2004;59(2):105. - PubMed
    1. Bartell AL, Spyridakis JH. Managing Risk in Internet-Based Survey Research. Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2012 IEEE International. :1–6.
    2. Birnbaum MH. Human Research and Data Collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004;55:803–832. - PubMed
    3. Gosling SD, Vazire S, Srivastava S, John OP. Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions about Internet Questionnaires. American Psychologist. 2004;59(2):93–104. - PubMed
    4. Konstan JA, Simon Rosser BR, Ross MW, Stanton J, Edwards WM. The Story of Subject Naught: A Cautionary but Optimistic Tale of Internet Survey Research. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 2005;10(2)
    5. Miner MH, Bockting WO, Swinburne Romine R, Raman S. Conducting Internet Research with the Transgender Population: Reaching Broad Samples and Collecting Valid Data. Social Science Computer review. 2012;30(2):202–211. - PMC - PubMed
    6. Reips J, Musch U-D. A Brief History of Web Experimenting. In: Birnbaum MH, editor. Psychological Experiments on the Internet. San Diego: Elsevier; 2000. pp. 61–87.
    7. Mustanski BS. Getting wired: Exploiting the Internet for the Collection of Valid Sexuality Data. Journal of Sex Research. 2001;38(4):292–301.
    8. Nosek BA, Banaji MR, Greenwald AG. E-Research: Ethics, Security, Design, and Control in Psychological Research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues. 2002;58(1):161–176.
    9. Reips U-D. Internet-Based Psychological Experimenting Five Dos and Five Don’ts. Social Science Computer Review. 2002;20(3):241–249.
    10. Reips U-D. Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) 2002;49(4):243–256. - PubMed
    11. Riggle EDB, Rostosky SS, Reedy CS. Online Surveys for BGLT Research: Issues and Techniques. Journal of Homosexuality. 2005;49(2):1–21. see also Bauermeister, “Data Quality in HIV/AIDS Web-Based Surveys Handling Invalid and Suspicious Data,” supranote 2; Bauermeister, “Innovative Recruitment Using Online Networks: Lessons Learned from an Online Study of Alcohol and Other Drug Use Utilizing a Web-Based, Respondent-Driven Sampling (webRDS) Strategy,” supranote 2; Kraut, supranote 2. - PubMed

    1. See Bauermeister “Data Quality in HIV/AIDS Web-Based Surveys Handling Invalid and Suspicious Data,” supra note 2.

    1. Swinburne Romine R, Miner MH, Gonzalez C, Hoefer C, Bockting WO. The Effects of Fraudulent Respondents on Internet-Based Research with Hard to Reach Populations: Experience from All Gender Health Online. 2014 unpublished manuscript.

Publication types