Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Oct;19(10):1928-37.
doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1033-y.

An updated protocol to detect invalid entries in an online survey of men who have sex with men (MSM): how do valid and invalid submissions compare?

Jeremy A Grey  1 , Joseph Konstan  2 , Alex Iantaffi  3 , J Michael Wilkerson  4 , Dylan Galos  5 , B R Simon Rosser  5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

An updated protocol to detect invalid entries in an online survey of men who have sex with men (MSM): how do valid and invalid submissions compare?

Jeremy A Grey et al. AIDS Behav. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Researchers use protocols to screen for suspicious survey submissions in online studies. We evaluated how well a de-duplication and cross-validation process detected invalid entries. Data were from the Sexually Explicit Media Study, an Internet-based HIV prevention survey of men who have sex with men. Using our protocol, 146 (11.6 %) of 1254 entries were identified as invalid. Most indicated changes to the screening questionnaire to gain entry (n = 109, 74.7 %), matched other submissions' payment profiles (n = 56, 41.8 %), or featured an IP address that was recorded previously (n = 43, 29.5 %). We found few demographic or behavioral differences between valid and invalid samples, however. Invalid submissions had lower odds of reporting HIV testing in the past year (OR 0.63), and higher odds of requesting no payment compared to check payments (OR 2.75). Thus, rates of HIV testing would have been underestimated if invalid submissions had not been removed, and payment may not be the only incentive for invalid participation.

Keywords: Bias; HIV; Questionnaires; Survey methods; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. van Gelder MMHJ, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1292. - PubMed
    1. Bowen A. Internet sexuality research with rural men who have sex with men: can we recruit and retain them? J Sex Res. 2005;42(4):317–23. - PubMed
    1. Rosser BRS, Konstan J, Gurak L, et al. Recruiting high risk Latino MSM for Internet prevention research. STD/HIV Prevention and the Internet Conference; Washington. 2001.
    1. Salyers Bull S, Lloyd L, Rietmeijer C, McFarlane M. Recruitment and retention of an online sample for an HIV prevention intervention targeting men who have sex with men: The Smart Sex Quest Project. AIDS Care. 2004;16(8):931–43. - PubMed
    1. Bockting WO, Miner MH, Robinson BE, et al. Use of the Internet to reach the US transgender population for HIV/STD prevention research. STD/HIV Prevention and the Internet Conference; Washington. 2003.

Publication types