Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 13:18:20932.
doi: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.20932.

Measuring psychological flexibility in medical students and residents: a psychometric analysis

Christie L Palladino  1 , Brittany Ange, Deborah S Richardson, Rhonda Casillas, Matt Decker, Ralph A Gillies, Amy House, Michael Rollock, William H Salazar, Jennifer L Waller, Ronnie Zeidan, Lara Stepleman
Affiliations

Measuring psychological flexibility in medical students and residents: a psychometric analysis

Christie L Palladino et al. Med Educ Online. .

Abstract

Purpose: Psychological flexibility involves mindful awareness of our thoughts and feelings without allowing them to prohibit acting consistently with our values and may have important implications for patient-centered clinical care. Although psychological flexibility appears quite relevant to the training and development of health care providers, prior research has not evaluated measures of psychological flexibility in medical learners. Therefore, we investigated the validity of our learners' responses to three measures related to psychological flexibility.

Methods: Fourth-year medical students and residents (n=275) completed three measures of overlapping aspects of psychological flexibility: (1) Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II); (2) Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ); and (3) Mindful Attention and Awareness Questionnaire (MAAS). We evaluated five aspects of construct validity: content, response process, internal structure, relationship with other variables, and consequences.

Results: We found good internal consistency for responses on the AAQ (α=0.93), MAAS (α=0.92), and CFQ (α=0.95). Factor analyses demonstrated a reasonable fit to previously published factor structures. As expected, scores on all three measures were moderately correlated with one another and with a measure of life satisfaction (p<0.01).

Conclusion: Our findings provide preliminary evidence supporting validity of the psychological flexibility construct in a medical education sample. As psychological flexibility is a central concept underlying self-awareness, this work may have important implications for clinical training and practice.

Keywords: assessment; mindfulness; psychological flexibility; psychological well-being; psychometrics; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Theoretical relationship among the AAQ-II, CFQ-28, and MAAS.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Beach MC, Inui T. Relationship-centered care. A constructive reframing. J Gen Inter Med. 2006;21(1 Suppl):S3–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087–110. - PubMed
    1. Hammer RR. An education that pierces what the knife cannot: a student perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:151–3. - PubMed
    1. Kashdan TB, Rottenberg J. Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30:865–78. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes, and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44:1–25. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources