Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Prescription psychostimulant use, admissions and treatment initiation and retention in pregnant people with opioid use disorder

Abstract

While attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is common among people with addiction, the risks and benefits of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication in pregnant people with opioid use disorder are poorly understood. Here, using US multistate administrative data, we examined 3,247 pregnant people initiating opioid use disorder treatment, of whom 5% received psychostimulants. Compared to peers not receiving psychostimulants, the psychostimulant cohort had greater buprenorphine (adjusted relative risk 1.81 (1.50–2.18)) but lower methadone initiation (adjusted relative risk 0.39 (0.19–0.78)). Among psychostimulant recipients who initiated buprenorphine, we observed lower buprenorphine discontinuation associated with the psychostimulant cohort compared to nonrecipients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.77 (0.67–0.88)). In within-person case-crossover analyses, person-days defined by psychostimulant fills were associated with fewer substance use disorder-related admissions compared to days without fills (odds ratio 0.50 (0.33–0.76)). Overall, our data suggest that psychostimulant use in pregnancy may be associated with increased buprenorphine initiation, decreased methadone initiation and improved buprenorphine retention. Decreased substance use disorder-related admissions were associated with person-days of psychostimulant receipt, although other risks of psychostimulant use in pregnancy warrant further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Differences in substance use disorder treatment outcomes in pregnant individuals with or without psychostimulant prescriptions.
Fig. 2: Diagram of sample set inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The MarketScan data are proprietary and can be accessed via a request to Merative (marketscan.support@merative.com). No additional data are available.

Code availability

Relevant code is available on written reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Schiff, D. M. et al. Fatal and nonfatal overdose among pregnant and postpartum women in Massachusetts. Obstet. Gynecol. 132, 466–474 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hayatbakhsh, M. R. et al. Illicit drug use before and during pregnancy at a tertiary maternity hospital 2000–2006. Drug Alcohol Rev. 30, 181–187 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiff, D. M. et al. Perinatal opioid use disorder research, race, and racism: a scoping review Pediatrics https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052368 (2022).

  4. Saia, K. A. et al. Caring for pregnant women with opioid use disorder in the USA: expanding and improving treatment. Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. 5, 257–263 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schiff, D. M. et al. Assessment of racial and ethnic disparities in the use of medication to treat opioid use disorder among pregnant women in massachusetts. JAMA Netw. Open https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5734 (2020).

  6. Xu, K. Y. et al. Initiation and treatment discontinuation of medications for opioid use disorder in pregnant compared with nonpregnant people. Obstet Gynecol. 141, 845–853 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Quinn, P. D. et al. ADHD medication and substance-related problems. Am. J. Psychiatry 174, 877–885 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Heikkinen, M. et al. Association of pharmacological treatments and hospitalization and death in individuals with amphetamine use disorders in a Swedish Nationwide Cohort of 13 965 patients. JAMA Psychiatry 80, 31–39 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kast, K. A., Rao, V. & Wilens, T. E. Pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and retention in outpatient substance use disorder treatment: a retrospective cohort study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 82, 20m13598 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mintz, C. M. et al. Analysis of stimulant prescriptions and drug-related poisoning risk among persons receiving buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. JAMA Netw. Open https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11634 (2022).

  11. Tardelli, V. et al. Prescription amphetamines in people with opioid use disorder and co-occurring psychostimulant use disorder initiating buprenorphine: an analysis of treatment retention and overdose risk. BMJ Ment. Health 26, e300728 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman, M. P. ADHD and pregnancy. Am. J. Psychiatry 171, 723–728 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams, A. R., Nunes, E. V., Bisaga, A., Levin, F. R. & Olfson, M. Development of a Cascade of Care for responding to the opioid epidemic. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 45, 1–10 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Whitley, S. D. et al. Factors associated with complicated buprenorphine inductions. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 39, 51–57 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Suarez, E. A. et al. Buprenorphine versus methadone for opioid use disorder in pregnancy. New Engl. J. Med. 387, 2033–2044 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levin, F. R. et al. Treatment of methadone-maintained patients with adult ADHD: double-blind comparison of methylphenidate, bupropion and placebo. Drug Alcohol Depend. 81, 137–148 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cassidy, T. A. et al. Nonmedical use of prescription ADHD stimulant medications among adults in a substance abuse treatment population: early findings from the NAVIPPRO surveillance system. J. Atten. Disord. 19, 275–283 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bramness, J. G. & Kornor, H. Benzodiazepine prescription for patients in opioid maintenance treatment in Norway. Drug Alcohol Depend. 90, 203–209 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abel, K. F., Bramness, J. G. & Martinsen, E. W. Stimulant medication for ADHD in opioid maintenance treatment. J. Dual Diagn. 10, 32–38 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moraff, C. Forced to quit methadone because of his Adderall prescription. Filter Magazine https://filtermag.org/quit-methadone-adderall/ (2020).

  21. Lugoboni, F. et al. Co-occurring attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adults affected by heroin dependence: patients characteristics and treatment needs. Psychiatry Res. 250, 210–216 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Krans, E. E. et al. Outcomes associated with the use of medications for opioid use disorder during pregnancy. Addiction 116, 3504–3514 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, K. Y., Mintz, C. M., Presnall, N., Bierut, L. J. & Grucza, R. A. Association of bupropion, naltrexone, and opioid agonist treatment with stimulant-related admissions among people with opioid use disorder: a case-crossover analysis. J. Clin. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.21m14112 (2022).

  24. Martin, C. E. et al. Disparities in opioid use disorder-related hospital use among postpartum Virginia Medicaid members. J. Subst. Use Addict. Treat. 145, 208935 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, K. Y. et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in buprenorphine and methadone utilization among reproductive-age women with opioid use disorder: an analysis of multi-state medicaid claims in the USA (2011–2016). J. Gen. Intern. Med. 38, 3499–3508 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson, K. N. et al. ADHD medication use during pregnancy and risk for selected birth defects: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1998–2011. J. Atten. Disord. 24, 479–489 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Diav-Citrin, O. et al. Methylphenidate in pregnancy: a multicenter, prospective, comparative, observational study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 77, 1176–1181 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dideriksen, D., Pottegård, A., Hallas, J., Aagaard, L. & Damkier, P. First trimester exposure to methylphenidate. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. 112, 73–76 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huybrechts, K. F. et al. Association between methylphenidate and amphetamine use in pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations a cohort study from the International Pregnancy Safety Study Consortium. JAMA Psychiatry 75, 167–175 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolding, L. et al. Associations between ADHD medication use in pregnancy and severe malformations based on prenatal and postnatal diagnoses: a Danish registry-based study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 82, 20m13458 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Madsen, K. B. et al. In utero exposure to ADHD medication and long-term offspring outcomes. Mol. Psychiatry 28, 1739–1746 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Szpunar, M. J. et al. Risk of major malformations in infants after first-trimester exposure to stimulants results from the Massachusetts General Hospital national pregnancy registry for psychiatric medications. J. Clin. Psychopharm. 43, 326–332 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Suarez, E. A. et al. Prescription stimulant use during pregnancy and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children. JAMA Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5073 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cohen, J. M. et al. Placental complications associated with psychostimulant use in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 130, 1192–1201 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Treatment and management of mental health conditions during pregnancy and postpartum: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 5. Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005202 (2023).

  36. Friedman, J. et al. Assessment of racial/ethnic and income disparities in the prescription of opioids and other controlled medications in California. JAMA Intern. Med. 179, 469–476 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang, K. G., Flores, M. W., Carson, N. J. & Cook, B. L. Racial and ethnic disparities in childhood ADHD treatment access and utilization: results from a national study. Psychiatr. Serv. 73, 1338–1345 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brinkman, W. B. et al. Relationship between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care and medication continuity. J. Am. Acad. Child. Psychiatry 55, 289–294 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Perwien, A., Hall, J., Swensen, A. & Swindle, R. Stimulant treatment patterns and compliance in children and adults with newly treated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Manag. Care Pharm. 10, 122–129 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu, K. Y. et al. Association between benzodiazepine or Z-drug prescriptions and drug-related poisonings among patients receiving buprenorphine maintenance: a case-crossover analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 178, 651–659 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Brunelli, S. M. et al. Estimation using all available covariate information versus a fixed look-back window for dichotomous covariates. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 22, 542–550 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bello, J. K., Salas, J. & Grucza, R. Preconception health service provision among women with and without substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109194 (2022).

  43. Palmsten, K. et al. Harnessing the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) to evaluate medications in pregnancy: design considerations. PLoS ONE 8, e67405 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jones, H. E., Chisolm, M. S., Jansson, L. M. & Terplan, M. Naltrexone in the treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: common ground. Addiction 108, 255–256 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Meinhofer, A., Williams, A. R., Johnson, P., Schackman, B. R. & Bao, Y. Prescribing decisions at buprenorphine treatment initiation: do they matter for treatment discontinuation and adverse opioid-related events? J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 105, 37–43 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Dong, H. R., Stringfellow, E. J., Russell, W. A., Bearnot, B. & Jalali, M. S. Impact of alternative ways to operationalize buprenorphine treatment duration on understanding continuity of care for opioid use disorder. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-022-00985-w (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Allison, P. & Christakis, N. Fixed-effects methods for the analysis of nonrepeated events. Sociol.Methodol. 36, 155–172 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mittleman, M. A. & Mostofsky, E. Exchangeability in the case-crossover design. Int. J. Epidemiol. 43, 1645–1655 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hallas, J., Pottegard, A., Wang, S., Schneeweiss, S. & Gagne, J. J. Persistent user bias in case-crossover studies in pharmacoepidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 184, 761–769 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ellis, M. S. et al. Gabapentin use among individuals initiating buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. JAMA Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3145 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu, K. Y. et al. Association of opioid use disorder treatment with alcohol-related acute events. JAMA Netw. Open https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0061 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals: L. Bierut (Washington University), T. Fidalgo (Federal University of Sao Paulo) and V. Tardelli (University of Toronto) for their thoughtful insights that contributed to this manuscript; J. Goldbach and K. Bucholz of the Transdisciplinary Training in Addictions Research (TranSTAR) T32 Program of Washington University for obtaining funding to support effort for personnel (K.Y.X.); P. Cavazos-Rehg and L. Bierut of the NIDA K12 Program of Washington University for obtaining funding to support effort for personnel (K.Y.X.); M. Keller, J. Sahrmann and D. Stwalley from the Center for Administrative Data Research (CADR) of Washington University for technical support of the MarketScan Databases. Merative and MarketScan are trademarks of Merative Corporation in the United States, other countries or both. This project was funded by R21 DA044744 (K.Y.X., principal investigator (PI): R.A.G./L. Bierut). Effort for some personnel was supported by grants T32 DA015035 (K.Y.X., PI: K. Bucholz, J. Goldbach) and K12 DA041449 (KYX, PI: L. Bierut, P. Cavazos-Rehg), St. Louis University Research Institute Fellowship (R.A.G.) and K23 DA053507 (C.E.M.), but these grants did not fund the analyses of the Merative MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database data performed by K.Y.X. C.A.D.R. is supported in part by the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences via grants UL1 TR002345 (from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept: K.Y.X., T.D.M.B., C.E.M. and R.A.G. Design: K.Y.X., T.D.M.B., C.E.M. and R.A.G. Analysis of data: K.Y.X. Interpretation of data: K.Y.X., T.D.M.B., C.E.M., H.E.J., E.B.C., J.C.K., C.M.M., F.R.L. and R.A.G. Drafting of manuscript: K.Y.X., T.D.M.B., C.E.M. and R.A.G. Obtained funding: R.A.G. Administrative, technical or material support: R.A.G. Critical revision for important intellectual content: K.Y.X., T.D.M.B., C.E.M., H.E.J., E.B.C., J.C.K., C.M.M., F.R.L. and R.A.G. Per Center for Administrative Data Research Data Use Agreement guidelines, K.Y.X. was the only individual who had access to the data and the only one to perform analyses. All the other authors did not have access to the data, although they contributed to the interpretation of data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Y. Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.A.G. reported receiving grants from the NIH and Arnold Ventures LLC during the conduct of the study, consulting for Janssen Pharmaceuticals and receiving personal fees for grant reviews from the NIH outside the submitted work. These funding sources had no influence on the design and analysis of the present study. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Mental Health thanks Kristopher Kast and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Protocols 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Models illustrate adjusted relative risks estimated from multivariable Poisson regression models. CI, confidence interval; D/o, disorder; UD, use disorder.

Supplementary Table 2

Models illustrate adjusted hazard ratios estimated from multivariable Cox regression models. CI, confidence interval; D/o, disorder; UD, use disorder.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, K.Y., Berkel, T.D.M., Martin, C.E. et al. Prescription psychostimulant use, admissions and treatment initiation and retention in pregnant people with opioid use disorder. Nat. Mental Health (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00270-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00270-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing