Key points
-
Since public funding is finite, we need to consider the relative value of different types of care.
-
Many preventive interventions produce good outcomes relative to cost, but they may require additional funding.
-
Population health interventions, such as water fluoridation, generally tend to be cost-saving, whereas the evidence for cost-saving using more selective, clinically based interventions is mixed, which is a pattern also seen across healthcare more generally.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey P A, Marcenes W. Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 1355-1361.
Cohen J T, Neumann P J, Weinstein M C. Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidates. N Eng J Med 2008; 358: 661-663.
Nguyen T M, Tonmukayakul U, Le L K, Calache H, Mihalopoulos C. Economic Evaluations of Preventive Interventions for Dental Caries and Periodontitis: A Systematic Review. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2023; 21: 51-70.
Davidson T, Blomma C, Bågesund M et al. Cost-effectiveness of caries preventive interventions - a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2021; 79: 309-320.
Tickle M, O'Neill C, Donaldson M et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Caries Prevention in Dental Practice. J Dent Res 2017; 96: 741-746.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, R. The costs of oral disease prevention versus treatment. Br Dent J 236, 966 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-7556-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-024-7556-8