Apple's Proposal to Allow Third-Party Payment Methods in App Store 'Lacks Detail,' Says South Korean Regulatory Commission

Apple's plans to allow developers to use third-party alternative payments methods within their apps in South Korea "lacks concrete detail," according to South Korea's Communications Commission (KCC).

General App Store South Korea Feature Feature
In August, South Korea passed a law that bans app store operators from requiring developers to use their in-app purchase systems. Last month, Apple submitted its compliance plans to the KCC that would allow apps in Apple's South Korean App Store to use third-party payment methods within their apps. Apple's plans include that the company will still take a commission for all purchases made, even those made with third-party alternative payment methods, but specific details were not shared.

Now, ahead of the law being finalized and enacted, South Korea's KCC says Apple's submitted plan "lacks concrete detail," reports Reuters. KCC is unhappy that both Apple and Google still plan to charge a commission on purchases made with third-party payment methods, arguing that such a commission will entice developers to stay with the app stores' respective, default payment process.

"As a result of any policy, if app developers find it realistically difficult to use an alternative payment system and resort to using the dominant app store operator's payment system, it would not fit the law's purpose," the official said, adding that this stance would likely be reflected in the final ordinance."

A similar series of events have taken place in The Netherlands, one of several countries looking into Apple's ‌App Store‌. Dating apps in The Netherlands will soon be allowed to use third-party alternative payment methods. Apple's plans to comply with the law in The Netherlands have been criticized for being inadequate in addressing concerns, leading to a fine of 5 million euros per week up to a maximum of 50 million euros until Apple complies.

"We look forward to working with the KCC and our developer community on a solution that benefits our Korean users," Apple had previously said in a statement about the law in South Korea. "Our work will always be guided by keeping the ‌App Store‌ a safe and trusted place for our users to download the apps they love," the company added.

Popular Stories

iPhone SE 4 Vertical Camera Feature

iPhone SE 4 Rumored to Use Same Rear Chassis as iPhone 16

Friday July 19, 2024 7:16 am PDT by
Apple will adopt the same rear chassis manufacturing process for the iPhone SE 4 that it is using for the upcoming standard iPhone 16, claims a new rumor coming out of China. According to the Weibo-based leaker "Fixed Focus Digital," the backplate manufacturing process for the iPhone SE 4 is "exactly the same" as the standard model in Apple's upcoming iPhone 16 lineup, which is expected to...
iPhone 16 Pro Sizes Feature

iPhone 16 Series Is Just Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Monday July 15, 2024 4:44 am PDT by
Apple typically releases its new iPhone series around mid-September, which means we are about two months out from the launch of the iPhone 16. Like the iPhone 15 series, this year's lineup is expected to stick with four models – iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max – although there are plenty of design differences and new features to take into account. To bring ...
iphone 14 lineup

Cellebrite Unable to Unlock iPhones on iOS 17.4 or Later, Leak Reveals

Thursday July 18, 2024 4:18 am PDT by
Israel-based mobile forensics company Cellebrite is unable to unlock iPhones running iOS 17.4 or later, according to leaked documents verified by 404 Media. The documents provide a rare glimpse into the capabilities of the company's mobile forensics tools and highlight the ongoing security improvements in Apple's latest devices. The leaked "Cellebrite iOS Support Matrix" obtained by 404 Media...
tinypod apple watch

TinyPod Turns Your Apple Watch Into an iPod

Wednesday July 17, 2024 3:18 pm PDT by
If you have an old Apple Watch and you're not sure what to do with it, a new product called TinyPod might be the answer. Priced at $79, the TinyPod is a silicone case with a built-in scroll wheel that houses the Apple Watch chassis. When an Apple Watch is placed inside the TinyPod, the click wheel on the case is able to be used to scroll through the Apple Watch interface. The feature works...
bsod

Crowdstrike Says Global IT Outage Impacting Windows PCs, But Mac and Linux Hosts Not Affected

Friday July 19, 2024 3:12 am PDT by
A widespread system failure is currently affecting numerous Windows devices globally, causing critical boot failures across various industries, including banks, rail networks, airlines, retailers, broadcasters, healthcare, and many more sectors. The issue, manifesting as a Blue Screen of Death (BSOD), is preventing computers from starting up properly and forcing them into continuous recovery...
Apple Watch Series 9

2024 Apple Watch Lineup: Key Changes We're Expecting

Tuesday July 16, 2024 7:59 am PDT by
Apple is seemingly planning a rework of the Apple Watch lineup for 2024, according to a range of reports from over the past year. Here's everything we know so far. Apple is expected to continue to offer three different Apple Watch models in five casing sizes, but the various display sizes will allegedly grow by up to 12% and the casings will get taller. Based on all of the latest rumors,...

Top Rated Comments

Michael Scrip Avatar
32 months ago
Google has already stated how they will handle commissions in South Korea:

15% if you use the Google Play Store payment system
11% if you use another payment system

I'm guessing Apple will do something similar.

But you may be saying "that's only 4% less... once the developer pays for outside payment processing... it'll be roughly the same as if Google handled it all!"

That's true! So maybe instead of arguing about

"alternative payment systems"

developers should have been begging for

"lower commission fees"

Because guess what... payment fees are pretty standard nowadays. 3% to 4%

But it's the platform commission fees were always the bulk of what developers paid.

No one ever talked about it because it was all rolled into one flat fee.

But now that we can separate platform fees and payment fees... I guess people will start arguing about commission fees next!

:p
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
neuropsychguy Avatar
32 months ago
“KCC is unhappy that both Apple and Google still plan to charge a commission on purchases made with third-party payment methods.”

There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. If the commission fees are banned, the companies will make it up elsewhere.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DelayedGratificationGene Avatar
32 months ago
It’s absurd to think Apple will never be allowed to charge a commission with or without payment options. If that happened then every platform from Walmart to PlayStation would never make money and be forced out of business. Stop even questioning the commission aspect because it’s NOT going away.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AndiG Avatar
32 months ago

Google has already stated how they will handle commissions in South Korea:

15% if you use the Google Play Store payment system
11% if you use another payment system

I'm guessing Apple will do something similar.

But you may be saying "that's only 4% less... once the developer pays for outside payment processing... it'll be roughly the same as if Google handled it all!"

That's true! So maybe instead of arguing about

"alternative payment systems"

developers should have been begging for

"lower commission fees"

Because guess what... payment fees are pretty standard nowadays. 3% to 4%

But it's the platform commission fees were always the bulk of what developers paid.

No one ever talked about it because it was all rolled into one flat fee.

But now that we can separate platform fees and payment fees... I guess people will start arguing about commission fees next!

:p
Guess that is the point. Apple has never declared how it is going to control bank transfers and collect fees. What is the difference between using a locally implemented in app payment and a payment on a website? What if the app invokes a website for payment? What if the app displays the website in an integrated browser within the app?

Guess Apple is simply not allowed to control transfers of money? Why doesn't Microsoft charge me, when I use internet banking using Microsofts edge browser on Windows?

Apples proposal is simply rediculous. Will Apple charge me for any bank transfer that is done using macOS? What if I buy a movie on AmazonPrime using macOS? What if I use iPadOS? Does it make a difference if I use an App or the browser?

Lots of questions.

They got very greedy ...
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DelayedGratificationGene Avatar
32 months ago
“Ok Epic here is your commission invoice for your 3rd party payment transactions”….”what?”…”wait!”…”so now it’s costing me to have a 3rd party payment system PLUS I still have to pay you guys commission for your awesome platform?!”…”man this is going all the wrong way!”……hmmm I should have thought this out better
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
macar00n Avatar
32 months ago
If they're going to act like this, then they should have the iPhone and its app store taken away. Imagine telling a physical store that you want to put your products on its shelves for free, want your own payment method added to their checkout for free, and dictate the exact terms of how they are sold. South Korean lawmakers are completely out of touch, and would be straightened out by their citizens in about ten minutes if Apple threatened to pull out of the country.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)