U.S. Music Industry Revenue Grew 11% in 2016 Thanks to Streaming Music Services

Estimated retail revenues from recorded music in the United States grew 11.4 percent to $7.7 billion in 2016, according to the Recording Industry Association of America. Streaming music revenue from companies like Spotify, Apple, Pandora, and YouTube accounted for 51.4 percent of that total and for the first time, contributed the majority of the year's revenue.

musicindustryrevenue
At 11 percent growth, the music industry saw the biggest increase it's had since 1998, a time when six times more CDs were sold than today. Overall revenue continues to be half of what it was in 1999, and revenues from traditional unit-based sales, including physical products and digital downloads, have continued to decline. Physical sales accounted for just 21.8 percent of music industry revenue in 2016, while digital downloads and ringtones made up 24.1 percent.

Total revenues from streaming platforms were up 68 percent year over year and came in at a total of $3.9 billion. Streaming revenues have seen major growth over the last several years, having made up just 9 percent of total industry revenues in 2011.

proportionofrevenuestreaming
All categories of streaming, including paid subscriptions, SoundExchange distributions, and on-demand ad-supported streams, saw growth. Paid subscriptions had the largest growth, accounting for $2.5 billion of the $3.9 billion made from streaming music.

Growth was driven by very strong new user adoption, as the number of paid subscriptions to full on-demand services grew 109% to average 22.6 million for the year, compared with 10.8 million in 2015. Adoption was driven by growth from both new and existing services, as it was the first full year of results for Apple Music, and other leading services like Spotify Premium grew as well.

In a blog post on Medium, Recording Industry Association of America CEO Cary Sherman points out that Apple Music pays the highest royalties to artists, more than Spotify and significantly more than YouTube, which Sherman claims exploits a "legal loophole" to pay creators at low rates.

applemusicpayments
According to Sherman, while 2016 was "year of significant progress" for the U.S. music business, "recovery is fragile and fraught with risk." Streaming services must make up losses from CDs and digital downloads, and the growth isn't there yet. "Much rides on a streaming market that must fairly recognize the enormous value of music," he writes.

Popular Stories

iPhone SE 4 Vertical Camera Feature

iPhone SE 4 Rumored to Use Same Rear Chassis as iPhone 16

Friday July 19, 2024 7:16 am PDT by
Apple will adopt the same rear chassis manufacturing process for the iPhone SE 4 that it is using for the upcoming standard iPhone 16, claims a new rumor coming out of China. According to the Weibo-based leaker "Fixed Focus Digital," the backplate manufacturing process for the iPhone SE 4 is "exactly the same" as the standard model in Apple's upcoming iPhone 16 lineup, which is expected to...
iPhone 17 Plus Feature

iPhone 17 Lineup Specs Detail Display Upgrade and New High-End Model

Monday July 22, 2024 4:33 am PDT by
Key details about the overall specifications of the iPhone 17 lineup have been shared by the leaker known as "Ice Universe," clarifying several important aspects of next year's devices. Reports in recent months have converged in agreement that Apple will discontinue the "Plus" iPhone model in 2025 while introducing an all-new iPhone 17 "Slim" model as an even more high-end option sitting...
iPhone 16 Pro Sizes Feature

iPhone 16 Series Is Just Two Months Away: Everything We Know

Monday July 15, 2024 4:44 am PDT by
Apple typically releases its new iPhone series around mid-September, which means we are about two months out from the launch of the iPhone 16. Like the iPhone 15 series, this year's lineup is expected to stick with four models – iPhone 16, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, and iPhone 16 Pro Max – although there are plenty of design differences and new features to take into account. To bring ...
Apple TV Plus Feature 2 Magenta and Blue

Apple TV+ Curbs Costs After Expensive Projects Fail to Capture Viewers

Monday July 22, 2024 5:11 am PDT by
Apple is scaling back its Hollywood spending after investing over $20 billion in original programming with limited success, Bloomberg reports. This shift comes after the streaming service, which launched in 2019, struggled to capture a significant share of the market, accounting for only 0.2% of TV viewership in the U.S., compared to Netflix's 8%. Despite heavy investment, critical acclaim,...
bsod

Microsoft Blames European Commission for Major Worldwide Outage

Monday July 22, 2024 11:55 am PDT by
Last Friday, a major CrowdStrike outage impacted PCs running Microsoft Windows, causing worldwide issues affecting airlines, retailers, banks, hospitals, rail networks, and more. Computers were stuck in continuous recovery loops, rendering them unusable. The failure was caused by an update to the CrowdStrike Falcon antivirus software that auto-installed on Windows 10 PCs, but Mac and Linux...

Top Rated Comments

SoN1NjA Avatar
96 months ago
I still don't understand how "ownership" got so devalued, at least with music and software.
Why would I want to pay $10.99 for an album (10 songs) when I can have 47M+ for $10
I understand you don't own the songs, but I don't want to listen to most of these songs in 5 years anyway

Plus I don't plan on canceling my membership anytime soon so they're not going away from me
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Chupa Chupa Avatar
96 months ago

Why would I want to pay $10.99 for an album (10 songs) when i can have 47M+ for $10
I understand you don't own the songs, but I don't want to listen to most of these songs in 5 years anyway

Plus I don't plan on canceling my membership anytime soon so they're not going away from me
Only you can answer that question for yourself.

Personally, I don't have the time to listen to 47m songs, and only a fraction of those are likely even worth a second listen or they would have more buzz. I have a nice collection going back 25 years and of course slowly growing annually with new material, though no where near the rate when I was young. Pay once never again. When I'm 50, 60, 70, still no additional cost to listen. No worries about having to keep paying ad infinitum for the privledge. And yes, still pleny of avenues to explore new music at zero cost.

And the bonus is that becaue I ripped from CD the quality is superior to anything that AM or Spotify streams -- especially important when listening at home. Also if a licensing issues errupts between a band or label and a streaming service that music goes poof. But it's still in my collection available for listening whenever I wish.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
BGarza Avatar
96 months ago
It's still royalties dude. Someone is getting paid and I bet my ass the artist is getting paid. So what difference does it make how much they get paid? If they have a problem, find a new ****ing job. The artist makes more in royalties than I did in the Navy and these ******* have the gaul to complain? Cry me a ****ing river.
My band played over 500 shows, opened for some of the biggest names imaginable for a couple of years (2007-2010). We worked day and night to songwrite, record, design, market, hussle, etc... Our live shows were killer, we got offered record deals, took a chance, quit our jobs, and really did 1000x better than our fellow Bay Area bands did, even got songs into TV, and a few major films. Despite all of our work, the money we made rarely even covered cheap motels, gas, oil changes on the van, replacement cables, and maybe eating subway once a day. Once it became obvious that there was nothing physical to sell anymore at live shows, we had to give up, for those 10-20 cd sales each night meant the difference between a motel vs. sleeping in the van. Being in a band is amazing, but streaming services are a joke to 99.9% of musicians.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JMacHack Avatar
96 months ago

And here I was hoping the MAFIAA would be dismantled soon enough with the new ability to self-publish. Guess I was wrong.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Chupa Chupa Avatar
96 months ago
I still don't understand how "ownership" got so devalued, at least with music and software.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
jimbobb24 Avatar
96 months ago
Half the income comes from streaming now? Wow.

Glad apple is paying the artists. Love finding so many. I still buy the digital downloads of my favorites hoping they get a little extra cash. They make my life so much more better.
[doublepost=1490910863][/doublepost]
My band played over 500 shows, opened for some of the biggest names imaginable for a couple of years (2007-2010). We worked day and night to songwrite, record, design, market, hussle, etc... Our live shows were killer, we got offered record deals, took a chance, quit our jobs, and really did 1000x better than our fellow Bay Area bands did, even got songs into TV, and a few major films. Despite all of our work, the money we made rarely even covered cheap motels, gas, oil changes on the van, replacement cables, and maybe eating subway once a day. Once it became obvious that there was nothing physical to sell anymore at live shows, we had to give up, for those 10-20 cd sales each night meant the difference between a motel vs. sleeping in the van. Being in a band is amazing, but streaming services are a joke to 99.9% of musicians.
This is one of the saddest posts I have ever seen. I love music. I am disappointed the artists do so poorly with so much effort - even when being big and getting into so many venues.

What genre?
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)