Journalism has a problem. Our challenge – and opportunity – is to do better.

Journalism has a problem. Our challenge – and opportunity – is to do better.


Nicholas Carlson, Global Editor-in-Chief of Insider Inc, originally published this post on Business Insider and INSIDER.

Dear readers: I just sent this note to our editorial team, and I thought you might want to see it too.

Team!

Last week, I went to the big tech and gadget convention in Las Vegas called CES. I got an excellent tour of the show from Business Insider deputy executive editor Cadie Thompson.

The most fascinating thing Cadie showed me were the self-driving cars — their interiors, actually.

They looked like little living rooms — places to sit and stare at your phone or watch a show on a huge screen built into the dashboard.

It made me realize we're only going to get even more screen time.

If not because of self-driving cars, then because of the rise of 5G and increased connectivity.

If not because of 5G, then because of the increasingly thinner, bigger, more flexible TV screens built into walls and glass everywhere you look.

Nielsen says US adults already spend 11 hours a day consuming media.

Is giving even more of our time to "content" a good thing?

For a few years, an ex-Googler named Tristan Harris has been leading a cause against technology companies that optimize their products toward driving user "time spent," rather than "time well spent."

He's pointed out that some technology companies have actually studied the problem of addiction, and reverse-engineered it to make people chase a feeling they'll forget as soon as they put down their phones.

But mindless "time spent" optimization isn't just a technology problem.

Journalism has a problem, too.

Thanks to the screens in front of our faces 11 hours every day, the demand for true storytelling and journalism is up.

But, perhaps due to challenging economics, the supply of journalism to fill those hours is weak — diluted or even dangerous.

Some journalism companies fill audiences' screens and feeds with cynical partisanship, outrage porn, de-contextualized reporting, cheap punditry, and even fake news.

This is bad for readers and viewers, but it's also bad for journalists. Stuck making this stuff, they end up viewing themselves as just #content creators and not the informing, inspiring storytellers they ought to be.

Our challenge — and opportunity — is to do better.

We often talk about how the mission for this company is sustainable journalism at scale in the 21st century.

But sustaining is a means to an end. We must be here to do something.

So, what are we here for?

At Insider Inc., we're here to tell great stories that make people feel that time spent with us is time well spent.

This is core to who we are, even if we aren't always perfect on this score.

It drives the depth of our reporting and the fairness of our analysis.

Time well spent goes up when time is treated with respect, and we respect our audience's time. Our audience can see that in our time-saving bullet points at the top of every story, and in our our emphasis on easy-to-consume visual storytelling. Our audience knows we are willing to go long — but only when the story calls for it.

They can see it in our story selection: We tell them what they want to know and what they need to know.

Yet even as proud as I am of these habits, we can do better.

In 2019, my goals — and leadership's goals — reflect this.

We are tasked with elevating Insider Inc.'s storytelling and journalism.

That means more breakout stories - investigations, features, and documentaries in video, text, photo, and audio.

That means creating video series that people come back to again and again, because they feel we respect the time they gave us.

That means making our sites and our social accounts the go-to places for people who want to follow the ongoing stories that matter to them or delight them most.

Let's do all this while continuing to avoid the dangerous and dilutive tactics on the rise elsewhere.

Let's do it by staying true to the acronym we use to define our voice and style — SCHAFFFF: smart, conversational, helpful, accurate, fast, fair, fearless, and fun.

Let's tell great stories.

Let's leave people with something when they put down their phones.

Nicholas Carlson

Global Editor-in-Chief, Insider Inc.

Pat Fitzgerald

Content Creator and Editor who's learning more about the L&D industry every day.

5y

What's missing from this whole equation is small-town journalists, who sadly are disappearing. These are the folks out there at night covering those "boring" City Council and School Board meetings — where the decisions made there have more of a direct effect on your life (especially if you own a home or have kids in school) than most anything else in the world. While a lot of those positions are filled by j-school grads who are still wet behind the ears, they are (or at least were) filled by older, experienced journalists who enjoyed being part of the community and not just drive-by reporter. Up until recently, I was one of the folks and enjoyed it — even after my heart attack.

Like
Reply
Tom Chapman

Grant Development, Article Writing / Editing, Clinical Trial Support, Data Analysis and Design, Market Access Consulting

5y

Based on what we all just experienced with the Buzzfeed Cohen story  -  "better" might be an understatement... pointing the finger at most TV Talking heads, which let's face it, are not journalists but instead actors performing their roles at the behest of their agenda-driven owners and advertisers.

Stephen Lange

Owner/Independent Insurance Agent at SRL Services, Inc.

5y

Journalists are the only ones between us, the people, and the political consequences of today. The truth. It’s probably are greatest hope for remaining free.

Roger Klein

I'm involuntarily retired, but would consider something part-time that would enable me to use my enthusiasm for radio and history.

5y

Journalism has a problem?  That's a major understatement if there ever was one.  The TV news establishment started falling apart when the likes of Frank Reynolds and John Chancellor left the scene.  As for the likes of the NY Times and its ilk, former VP Spiro Agnew summed them up best when he said, "Some newspapers get rid of their garbage by printing it."  Such discussions also remind me of a joke that I heard in the early 80's that went, "In the Soviet Union, "Tass" means news  and "Pravda" means truth; in the truth there's no news, and in the news there's no truth."  Fortunately, there are other sources of news and information, and I rely on them instead of today's liberally slanted propaganda outlets.  

Like
Reply

lobby then or lobbies anyways don't last long enuf.☺️

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics