Zoe Kleinman’s Post

View profile for Zoe Kleinman, graphic

Technology Editor, BBC News

My debut article for BBC News' new deep-dive section: it's all about the potent mix of Scarlett Johansson, Silicon Valley arrogance and AI safety. Usually my job is to tell a story concisely - I have 2 mins of airtime, or 200 words. So it was great to be able to really get into this. I hope you like it! https://lnkd.in/e7Hk3WkG

Scarlett Johansson's AI row has echoes of Silicon Valley's bad old days

Scarlett Johansson's AI row has echoes of Silicon Valley's bad old days

bbc.co.uk

Maria Luciana A.

Head of AI Public Policy and Ethics @ PwC UK | Award winning Responsible AI pioneer I LinkedIn Top Voice

2mo
Like
Reply
Brian Henderson

Scottish Technical architect - Mentor, 30+ years experience - open to Non-Executive roles - need free IT help & guidance just ask?

2mo

Magic , like AI, is very entertaining and even has shows at Las Vegas…… But Magic has no place in NHS surgery - as you cannot saw lady in half on the stage - you can fool an audience….. but not patient. Smoke & mirrors cannot compete with scalpals and reality bites. AI is entertainment IT - it is not mainstream IT (like databases, operating systems and applications) Here endth todays lesson, there is Magic circle chasing me…

  • No alternative text description for this image
Like
Reply
Andrew Wright

I help businesses revive their redundant IT assets, protect their data, save the environment, stimulate a circular economy, improve digital equality and boost their ESG Score

2mo

Bang on the money. I don't think anyone is expecting Hal to lock us out of Discovery One anytime soon, but the capabilities for plagiarism bypassing consent is a very real threat.

Brian Henderson

Scottish Technical architect - Mentor, 30+ years experience - open to Non-Executive roles - need free IT help & guidance just ask?

2mo

Zoe Kleinman Very interesting long-form article, much better than a 5-min byte-sized slot on BBC Today program…. Key quote for me: “The independent report also states that there is currently no reliable way of understanding exactly why AI tools generate the output that they do – even among developers”….. oh dear Without understanding why AI does x, we cannot test x and therefore cannot support x and should not release x. This has become a ‘have blind faith’ in AI… no way its computer stuff and computers are not as reliable as humans in a panic or crisis! We are looking at Magicians for example…. Its great entertainment….and sells a few magic kits and can do show at las vegas - but NHS cannot cut lady in half….. its a trick and not a useful business venture. Sadly #postofficescandal shown £1 billion HorizonIT could not be trusted to add up 1 million transactions per day and get right answers - its generated discrepancies for 20 years which PostOffice belived were stolen by 700+ innocent subpostmasters - who were convicted by computer - and Terminated! Dont trust computers more than you can throw them…. Awooga Trust scale: Mobile phone will throw 10 meters Laptop 2 meters Server 1 meter Google 10 cm Google AI 1 cm

Brian B.

Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) | Board Advisor | Cyber Security Executive

2mo

If you get to interview Scarlett, and need somebody to hold the boom, camera, make tea, supply hob nobs, clean shoes…. You have my number…

Annette Simmons

Trust is a dance that starts when we share our stories.

1mo

Add to this the global level of humans who currently and soon will experience "status injury" a sense of no longer feeling useful. Status injury leads to anger - we already have an epidemic of anger. And anger addicts rarely know what make them mad in the first place. Any target will do. And here we are.

Like
Reply
Chris Weston

Internationally experienced advisor, consultant, leader and speaker joining the dots between new technologies and organisational outcomes. Never Not Networking 😁 CIO100 panel

2mo

Great piece Zoe. "Move fast and break things" has indeed become a poor reflection on today's billionaire techbros that they are quite happy to break things that other people then have to fix. The original ethos was far more confined to their own systems with consequences for them alone (on the whole).

Like
Reply
Debra Aho Williamson

Research+advisory at the intersection of social media and AI | For the marketing and investment communities | ex eMarketer | researching consumer AI, META, Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, Google

2mo

"That report claimed there was currently no reliable way of understanding exactly why AI tools generate the output that they do - even their developers aren’t sure." To me that's the scariest sentence of all. If human developers can't fully grasp what AI is capable of right now, the chances of them being able to do it in the future are incredibly slim.

Thanks Zoe, a fascinating read full of intrigue!

Like
Reply

But there's no way that OpenAI would just treat a woman like their own property, literally taking her voice after explicit refusal. They're from Silicon Valley, the tip of the spear in the liberation of humanity from oppression. They support every liberal ideology, and incessantly drone on about their angelic levels of virtue. They would never, right?

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics