How can short-term climate scenarios enhance #climateresilience for financial institutions? Our latest report and Excel tool address the crucial gap in short-term scenario analysis, focusing on near-term risks, economic volatility, and systemic vulnerabilities. Produced by UNEP FI's Risk Centre in partnership with the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), this report provides asset managers, insurers, bankers, and investors with the tools to integrate climate commitments into short-term planning strategies. By exploring macroeconomic, transition, and physical risk scenarios, our Excel-based tool enables effective management of short-term climate risks. UNEP FI continues to deliver essential frameworks to help financial institutions navigate immediate climate challenges. Discover how these insights can fortify your approach to climate risk management. Read more: https://ow.ly/IN7G50SxmaQ
The UNEP FI and NIESR collaboration on short-term climate scenarios represents a significant advancement in addressing immediate climate risks, filling a crucial gap previously overlooked. The report's practical guide and Excel-based visualisation tool offer financial institutions a comprehensive methodology to integrate these scenarios into their planning processes. By focusing on severe, compound shocks, such as sudden spikes in carbon prices and geopolitical tensions, this initiative enhances institutional readiness and resilience. This approach both aids in aligning short-term strategies with climate risk mitigation and strengthens the financial system's capacity to handle acute shocks effectively. This initiative is a vital resource for understanding and preparing for immediate climate-related risks, ensuring a proactive response to evolving challenges.
I'll keep this in mind
ESG/Climate Finance Risk | Net Zero Carbon/Decarbonization S.M.E. | Commercial Real Estate Professional
6dWe know that Copernicus has said that last year, the "annual average temp" above pre-industrial levels was 1.64C. The five major scientific groups globally have said that they project we will reach the "30-year annual average temp" of 1.5C between 2032-2034. In a recent Guardian survey of the IPCC scientists, 80% said they believed we were headed to 2.5C of warming, and almost 50% said they anticipated we were headed to 3.0C. Why are we allowing the various Central Banks involved in NGFS (Network for Greening the Financial System) and their ten major banks to perform stress testing that suggests scenarios that are not in touch with this new reality? Why are we allowing Net Zero Signatories to support funding (debt/equity) building out, or insuring, real estate projects (infrastructure, buildings, ports, airports, data centers, schools,) that aren't engineered or designed (architecturally) to withstand this new reality (at least 2.5C of warming)? Don't we want infrastructure and buildings to withstand the change? I attended the ESRI conference in San Diego last week and saw what happens under the various climate scenarios. Let's work together to STOP Funding a built environment that isn't aligned with science!