VC funding hurts startups in more cases than it helps them. And this is on us, the founders, as we make fundraising a top priority, often ahead of focusing on customers or product building and conflate raising VC funding with success. Admittedly, I have done it more than once. It is a huge time sink, and even when successful in raising capital there are many ways it can hurt a startup. The pressure forces founders to do unnatural things that ultimately hurt their chance to succeed. Oftentimes, they increase their burn way beyond what’s appropriate for their stage and before true product market fit. This is usually followed by failed attempts to raise more money or a death spiral of continuous but never decisive enough cost-cutting. I have been through this situation. Not to mention companies who are even profitable but sit on a very high stack of preferred $$ that makes everyone give up. Many of the companies that fail this way have perfectly good markets or they can build a good product and a sustainable business with exit potential, but they miss out because they run out of money or an exit path. This is not to say don’t raise any money or don’t pay yourself a decent salary. The principle I follow and the advice I give to other founders is to always focus on building a product that people want to use and are willing to pay money for and prioritize revenue and traction. If you do that well, the rest will come, and if you hit on a truly scalable idea and traction, raising a lot of money to fuel growth becomes easy.
This reminded me of (again, this guy) Peter Thiel's jab comment on startups prioritizing burning cash and (to paraphrase) "disregarding something as pedestrian as cashflow and profit". But I sit with Jordi Visser on the camp of startups needing little to no capital moving forward. You say "which is going to be the first single-employee $1b company?" and I say challenge accepted.
Many founders fixate on fundraising as if this is the pinnacle of success. Founders, the purpose of your company is not to raise funds, it is to bring value to the customer/market. Funds is a means to an end. And yes, the more you survive without it, the better it is in many ways. Thanks for the post Spiros Xanthos
"The pressure forces founders to do unnatural things that ultimately hurt their chance to succeed." So few talk about this phenomenon.
Spiros Xanthos playing a little bit devil’s advocate - does early capital not allow to run multiple experiments (sometimes in parallel) and get to PMF faster ?
Truth
Very well said Spiros. 100% agree.
Founder's lack of experience is what sinks companies not VC money.
Co-Founder of FeedbackInGames.com & Playtesting.games | Help studios validate innovative games
3wSo don't raise until you reach product market fit? Do you think startups should raise on the pre-seed/seed stage? I get the focus part. In fact, Paul Graham wrote a wonderful essay back in the day about the top idea in your Mind: https://paulgraham.com/top.html But still, a startup needs to survive at the beginning, right?